SC partly closes suo motu petition after MP HC conditionally reinstates 4 of 6 terminated female judicial officers

Regarding the reinstatement of other two judicial officers, the Court will hear the matter on 24-09-2024, as the Full Court decided to not revoke their earlier resolutions and would place the adverse remarks and other materials against them before the Supreme Court in a sealed cover.

termination of judicial officers

Supreme Court: In a suo motu writ petition pertaining to termination of six women judicial officers, the Division Bench of BV Nagarathna and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, JJ. closed the lis in respect of four judicial officers, after noting that they have been considered for reinstatement subject to certain terms and conditions.

Insofar as two other officers were concerned, the Court was informed that there was no revocation of the earlier orders and resolutions and the Full Court of the High Court had also decided to place the adverse remarks and other materials against them before this Court in a sealed cover.

In view of the Court’s order in In Re: Termination of Civil Judge, Class-II (Jr. Division) Madhya Pradesh State Judicial Service1, for reconsideration of the matter, the Full Court considered the matter and submitted that that the termination of four Civil Judges, Junior Division be revoked with a condition that they be posted as Civil Judge, Junior Division with a probation period of one year without back-wages and they be placed at the bottom of their respective batch. They will regain their original seniority subject to their confirmation. The question of payment of salary from the date of termination till reinstatement was rejected.

After considering the ACRs gradings, disposal statistics, adverse remarks, complaints, overall performance, of the other two terminated Judges, the Full Court viewed that their termination could not be revoked.

In June, 2023, the Government had sacked six female Civil Judges, Junior Division from their services. The Administrative Committee concerned had affirmed this decision, followed by approval from the Full Court of the High Court.

The Court in its previous order, appointed Senior Advocate Gaurav Agarwal as Amicus Curaie in the matter.

CASE DETAILS

Citation:
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 142/2024

Appellants :
Sarita Choudhary

Respondents :
High Court of Madhya Pradesh

Advocates who appeared in this case

Amicus Curiae:
Senior advocate Gaurav Agarwal

For Petitioner(s):
Pardeep Gupta, Adv.; Parinav Gupta, Adv.; Mansi Gupta, Adv.; Dr. Vipin Gupta, AOR

For Respondent(s):
Arjun Garg, AOR; Aakash Nandolia, Adv.; Sagun Srivastava, Adv.; Kriti Gupta, Adv.; Sunny Choudhary, AOR; Sarthak Raizada Ga, Adv.; Sarad Kumar Singhania AOR; Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Adv.; R Basant, Sr. Adv.; Rekha Pandey, AOR; Gulab Sharma, Adv.; L C Patne, Adv.; Raghav Pandey, Adv.; Hitesh Sharma, Adv.; Akshay Sahai, Adv.; Gauri Pandey, Adv.; Tanvi Dubey, Adv.; Charu Mathur, AOR; Nekala Ganesh Kumar Reddy, Adv.; Aditya Nema, Adv.; Vivek K. Tankha, Sr. Adv.; Sumeer Sodhi, AOR; Varun Tankha, Adv.; Prasang Sharma, Adv.; Vipul Tiwari, Adv.; Inder Dev Singh, Adv.

CORAM :


1. Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No. 2/2023

Join the discussion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *