Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
University Institute of Legal Studies, Panjab University hosted a special lecture on trade, tariffs, WTO law, and international trade regulation featuring Prof. Prabhash Ranjan.
Continue reading
CAM advised Jana Small Finance Bank Limited on its preferential issue of 1,56,72,909 warrants to key investors on a private placement basis, subject to shareholder, stock exchange, and RBI approvals.
Continue reading
Coming Soon in Episode 02 of Law, Camera & Conversations by SCC Times, Advocate Anusha Soni in conversation with Sajan Poovayya, Senior
Continue reading
“Once an order of liquidation is passed and a statutory liquidator is appointed, the assets of the corporate debtor are required to be dealt with in accordance with Section 53 IBC i.e. the “waterfall mechanism” and the dues are to be paid in the order of priority set out in the section. Section 238 IBC contains a non-obstante clause giving primacy to the mechanism for distribution of the assets of the corporate debtor in the manner prescribed under the IBC.”
Continue reading
CAM advised Jana Holdings Limited on the sale of 5,160,903 equity shares representing approximately 4.9% stake in Jana Small Finance Bank Limited to TVS Motor Company Limited for an aggregate consideration of INR 193.31 crore.
Continue reading
CAM advised Garware Technical Fibres Limited on its buyback of up to 16,17,500 fully paid-up equity shares aggregating to INR 110 crore through the tender offer route.
Continue reading
Centre for Trans Studies, University Institute of Legal Studies, Panjab University invites submissions for the PRIDE Journal on transgender rights, gender diversity, and queer studies.
Continue reading
CAM acted as Indian legal counsel to the Lead Managers in the IPO of Bagmane Prime Office REIT, involving a fresh issue of Rs. 23,900 million and an offer for sale aggregating to Rs. 10,150 million by Blackstone affiliate BREP Asia III India Holding Co VIII Pte. Ltd.
Continue reading
From high-level deliberations to global arbitration insights, here are snippets from the Cyprus Arbitration Day 2026, where SCC Times was the sole
Continue reading
Faculty of Law, University of Lucknow organised the Justice V.K. Dixit Memorial National Conference 2026 on ADR mechanisms and pro bono legal services.
Continue reading
Manipal Law School, Bengaluru in collaboration with Indian Institute of Technology Madras announces Constructing Legal Foundations 2026 on construction law reforms.
Continue reading
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. has welcomed Akshay Sachthey back as Partner in its General Corporate Practice in Delhi, strengthening the Firm’s corporate advisory, M&A, and cross-border transactions capabilities.
Continue reading
“Unless the breach is so fundamental that it has contributed to the cause of the accident, the Insurance Company cannot avoid its liability.”
Continue reading
Aligarh Muslim University Malappuram Centre successfully organised the Intra-Departmental Moot Court Competition 2026 featuring advocacy, research, and oral argument rounds.
Continue reading
“What After Us?”: Delhi High Court Chief Justice Calls for Community-Owned Future for Adults with Autism & Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Continue reading
“However harsh or severe the harassment, unless there is a conscious deliberate intention, mens rea, to drive another person to suicidal death, there cannot be a finding of abetment under Section 306.”
Continue reading
The Court directed the confiscation of the property where a claim, which was presented to be based on a will, but was in substance an attempt to obtain judicial recognition of a benami transaction.
Continue reading
The acquisition involves nearly 20 acres of land in Gurugram’s Sector 81 and Sector 86, earmarked for residential development under licenses issued by the Department of Town and Country Planning, Haryana.
Continue reading
“The right to make a representation implies that the person detained must be informed of his right to make a representation to the authority that has made the order of detention at the time when he is served with the grounds of detention so as to enable him to make such a representation and the failure to do so results in denial of the right to make representation and renders the order invalid.”
Continue reading