
Landmark Constitutional Law Judgments in 2024 by the Supreme Court of India (Part IV of IV)
by Siddharth R. Gupta* and Vedanshi Gangrade**
Continue readingby Siddharth R. Gupta* and Vedanshi Gangrade**
Continue readingAmity Law School National Moot Court Competition – Environment Chapter 2025 (ANMCC 2025) aims to offer its participants an opportunity to engage in rigorous discussion and present arguments on pressing issues concerning the environment, society, and law.
Continue readingAs part of the transaction, the firm also advised on the internal restructuring of the Company’s global group.
Continue reading“If Government’s argument is accepted, it would amount to enslavement of these workmen and bonded labour. The Court cannot be a mute spectator to this situation.”
Continue readingAdvent has entered into agreements to acquire a majority shareholding in Sapiens International, a global leader in intelligent SaaS-based software solutions for the insurance industry.
Continue readingThe new Hallmarking Unique Identification (HUID)- based hallmarking for silver jewelry and articles introduces BIS Care App to safeguard consumers against any malpractices.
Continue readingCyril Amarchand Mangaldas assisted 26North Partners LP, as Indian legal counsel on its acquisition of a controlling stake in AVI-SPL, the global leader in audio-video and unified communications technologies, from Marlin Equity Partners and other selling shareholders.
Continue readingABOUT ORGANISATION CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Delhi, NCR Campus, a premier educational institution, is an academic fraternity of individuals dedicated to
Continue reading‘Information regarding the foreign assets has been placed on record in the form of documents before the Magistrate by the IT Department which has been sought by another government Department for the purpose of investigation. It is not a case that the information has been demanded for public dissemination.’
Continue reading‘Certificate of Assistant Lineman was not verified diligently during his probation period, and it was clearly due to the laxity displayed by the employee concerned that the appointment went through in spite of lack in requisite qualifications, thereby denying a rightful candidate his opportunity of public employment.’
Continue readingIn a simultaneous set of transactions, MGI BV will acquire an 11% stake in Shinnichi Kogyo Co. Ltd. (in which Yutaka Giken already holds 62%) and SAMIL (either directly or through a wholly owned subsidiary) will acquire 100% of the shares and voting rights in Yutaka Autoparts India Private Limited.
Continue reading“Gauhati High Court noted that the petitioners were employees of the Board and served on conditionally sanctioned posts, which were permanently retained and they were being paid their salary from grants-in-aid and not from the ordinary Head for disbursement of salary of the government employees.”
Continue readingThis conference aims to explore the multifaceted challenges and opportunities that arise in aligning national legal frameworks with international legal obligations.
Continue readingUmang Taneja had posted videos on YouTube and Instagram disparaging Trishla Chaturvedi by accusing her of practicing black magic and being a drug abuser.
Continue reading“Following the 2005 amendment, the creation of posts became subject to the decision of the Government, and the Syndicate’s role was shifted to approving appointments in accordance with that decision.”
Continue reading‘FLUID’ aims to provide a space, which goes beyond the confines of academic curricula, to freely vent out opinions, views and ideas regarding the world that is exceptionally gendered; tied to stereotypes, confining individuals within predefined boxes they are expected to fit into.
Continue readingThe course will provide 18+ hours of classroom training delivered by leading lawyers from the Law Offices of Panag & Babu alongside GNLU academicians.
Continue readingby Bhavana Chandak Dhoundiyal* and Shambhavi Upadhyay**
Continue reading“There was no provision to hear and decide the objections after the appeal was decided by the Divisional Commissioner because Rule 10 of the 1994 Rules laid down that the orders passed in appeal by the Divisional Commissioner would be final.”
Continue reading