Section 6A of Citizenship Act
Hot Off The PressNews

Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, permits foreign migrants of Indian origin who entered Assam between 01-01-1966, and 25-03-1971, to apply for Indian citizenship. This provision was introduced in 1985 as part of the Assam Accord, an agreement between the Government of India and leaders of the Assam movement, which aimed to address the concerns over illegal immigration from Bangladesh

Continue reading
New Lady Justice statue
Hot Off The PressNews

The new statue of ‘Lady Justice’ has been installed in the judges’ library of the Supreme Court, commissioned at the direction of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud.

Continue reading
KMC (Regularisation of Building) Regulations
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court clarified that till the date of communication of the order on the regularisation application, the limited interim relief granted on 6-08-2024 will continue to operate.

Continue reading
Quantified disability
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“It should be borne in mind that the RPwD Act which was enacted to give effect to the United Nations Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities – was with the objective of granting persons with disabilities full and effective participation and inclusion in society, grant them equal opportunity and to show respect for their inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make their own choices.”

Continue reading
International Bar Association Course 2024
Events/WebinarsNews

The event is kindly supported by Ciarb; Confederation of Indian Industry; SCC Times; and Society of Indian Law firms

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Each promise of marriage would not be considered as a fact of misconception for the purpose of consensual sexual intercourse unless it is established that such promise of marriage was a false promise of marriage on the part of the accused since the beginning of such a relationship.”

Continue reading
Limitation for adverse possession
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The evidence on the part of the appellants would reveal that instead of establishing ‘animus possidendi’ under hostile colour of title, they have tendered evidence indicating only permissive possession and at the same time failed to establish the time from which it was converted to adverse to the title of the respondent which is open and continuous for the prescriptive period.”

Continue reading
Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“PMLA, being a special and standalone statute, the trial proceedings under this Act do not have any bearing on the trial proceedings or the outcome of the trial proceedings of the scheduled offence.”

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The provisions of the Revenue Code will apply to the whole of Uttar Pradesh, except: (i) Chapter VIII which deals with management of land and other properties of Gram Panchayat or other local authorities, and (ii) Chapter IX which deals with tenures.”

Continue reading
Amar Sadhuram Mulchandani
Hot Off The PressNews

“However strict the PMLA is, we have to operate within the four corners of the law. The law tells us that someone who is sick and infirm should be granted bail. The point that he can be treated in a government hospital is no answer to what the statute says.”

Continue reading
Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court mentioned that the word “intrude” is not defined in IPC. Its dictionary meaning is to put oneself deliberately into a place or situation where one is unwelcome or uninvited. To put it otherwise, intrude means trespass, horn in, pry into or to join in something without invitation or consent to the privacy of the woman.

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Initially a writ petition was filed before the High Court in the year 2000 which was transferred to the Tribunal in 2017 and thereafter, it came to be dismissed in 2024, we request the Tribunal to grant priority to hearing of this petition, and expect that the Tribunal shall hear and decide the same within a period of five months”

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Allahabad High Court permitted the Moid Ahmad to apply for bail afresh after the expiry of four weeks and after the recording of the testimony of the informant and the victim.

Continue reading
Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court disposed of the habeas corpus petition after reviewing the State’s submissions, which indicated that the arrested individuals had been released on 08-10-2024, due to the Judicial Magistrate’s refusal to accept their remand.

Continue reading
Disciplinary proceedings against Lakshadweep Judge
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court said that the disciplinary proceedings against the Judicial Magistrate, have been initiated on the basis of a legally invalid order.

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Trial Court has not recorded any finding as to how the present case is ‘rarest of the rare case’ even though the accused has committed the gravest offence.

Continue reading
Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Kerala High Court said that there was no undue delay in filing the FIR, as the relationship was predicated on the promise of marriage

Continue reading
Engine factory promotions
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“To alter a seniority list after such a long period would be totally unjust to the multitudes of employees who could get caught in the labyrinth of uncertainty for no fault of theirs and may suffer loss of their seniority rights retrospectively.”

Continue reading
Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Display of provocative words commenting believers of God opposite to the Hindu Temple is the cause for the speech, and the person, who has provoked the speech cannot take advantage of their provocation and prosecute Kanal Kannan for his reaction.”

Continue reading
Khalsa University Repeal Act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The Khalsa University (Repeal) Act 2017, was enacted with a purpose which was non-existent, would fall under the ambit of manifest arbitrariness and would therefore be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.”

Continue reading