Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Differences of perception towards life may give rise to different behaviours by individuals. Such a difference of perception and behaviour may be described as cruel by others by observing the behaviour of another. At the same time, such perceptions are neither absolute nor such as may themselves give rise to allegations of cruelty unless observed and proven facts are such as may be recognized in law to be acts of cruelty.”

Continue reading
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Andhra Pradesh High Court quashed proceedings under Section 138 NI Act, ruling that the dishonor of a cheque issued on a State Bank of Hyderabad account, rendered invalid due to the bank’s merger with SBI and expiry of its validity in March 2018, does not attract liability under the NI Act.

Continue reading
Orissa High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The State Officials/police personnel have been directed to strictly follow the SOP formulated by the State Government on ‘Arrest of and Interaction with Members of Armed Forces in Police Stations’, and to circulate the same in Odia language to all the police stations and the police outposts of the State.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Such inter se discrimination between resignation simplicitor (on health grounds) and resignation for joining another CPSE, even though a similar Scheme is not available, in fact is clearly discriminatory, and has no nexus with the object sought to be achieved.”

Continue reading
Orissa High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The role of a writ court to interfere with the discretionary power of the appointing authority is necessarily limited. This discretion, however, must be exercised judiciously, with due regard to the principles of fairness, proportionality, and the objectives of public service. The authority retains the prerogative to evaluate a candidate’s fitness/ including instances of prior criminal antecedents or suppression of information.”

Continue reading
Sikkim High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Governor’s failure to consult the Commission as envisaged in Rule 10 of Sikkim Government Servants’ (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1985, while passing the order modifying the penalty, alone would not change the nature of the case.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The continuous acts of infringement by Movie World Visual Media Private Limited are resulting in serious reputational loss and undermining the economic interest of Saregama India Limited vis-a-vis other licensees who have acquired proper license for valuable consideration of Saregama’s copyrighted works.

Continue reading
Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘Pappanji’ typically refers to a large effigy, often constructed as part of local New Year or cultural celebrations in Kerala, particularly in places like Kochi. The effigy, often representing an exaggerated figure or caricature, is burned as a symbolic gesture to mark the end of the old year and to usher in the new one.

Continue reading
Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It merits notice that the phraseology used in Section 273B of the IT Act is such that no penalty can be imposed on an assessee under Section 271B for breach of the provisions, if he proves that there was ‘reasonable cause’ for the said failure.”

Continue reading