Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The certificate, in the present case, is issued by a doctor, who is an accused in a case registered with the Pundlik Nagar Police Station, Aurangabad, for offences punishable under Sections 120-B1, 3142, 2033, and 2014 of Penal Code, 1860.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The plaintiffs submitted that Defendant 1 is dishonestly using an identical and deceptively similar trade mark as that of the plaintiffs’, so that any ordinary consumer would be misled to believe that Defendant 1’s products are that of the plaintiffs or associated with or emanating from the plaintiffs.

Continue reading
Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It is alleged that the local MLA-the petitioner and his supporters visited Hospital to show their sympathy to the victim and her family member and after taking name, address and photograph of victim, it was sent to media and other organization from the petitioner’s mobile number.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Enquiry cannot be conducted in the status of Shivaji Bandappa Kalge, the returned candidate and he cannot be declared as not belonging to “Mala Jangam” community scheduled caste as he has a caste validity certificate in his favour by the Caste Scrutiny Committee which has exclusive jurisdiction to grant the said certificate.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

With respect to the offence under Section 304, the duration of imprisonment can only be ascertained at the conclusion of trial, and the period of investigation for that offence shall only be 60 days and not 90 days, unless the facts of a case undisputedly indicate an intention of the accused to cause death or bodily injury likely to cause death.

Continue reading
Karnataka High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court strictly observed that the offence against the petitioner is a shade more than horrendous. “More than horrendous, I say, for the reason that the petitioner is a teacher (…) If this cannot become a crime, it is not understandable as to what else can be”.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘Although Genpact had alluded to the amended statutory regime that had come into existence and had informed the AO of the obligation to follow the procedure under Section 148A, no legal challenge was instituted to impugn the action commenced by notice dated 30-06-2021.’

Continue reading