Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court underscored the necessity of concrete evidence in criminal prosecutions, particularly in cases involving digital content. The ruling reinforces those mere allegations, unsupported by forensic proof or substantial material, cannot justify the continuation of criminal proceedings.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“We have seen the rise in slums and illegal constructions in the State of Maharashtra over a period of time and no action has been taken to raze them. It is this inaction by the state authorities that fuels the desires of the persons like petitioners.”

Continue reading
Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

After applying the definition of Railway as defined under the Railways Act, 1989, to the contract between the petitioner and RVNL, it would constitute that the work specified under the contract is the original work pertaining to railway for the purpose of the subject notification and thus, covered under Serial No. 3(v)(a) of the notification dated 28-06-2017 issued by Central Government.

Continue reading
Saket Court
Case BriefsDistrict Court

There is no explanation on record as to why the victim did not depose in her examination-in-chief about commission of rape by the accused persons, which is the most important fact and there is no explanation as to how she forgot to mention such a material fact during her examination-in-chief.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“There are no cogent reasons or circumstances that have been established by the authorities to the satisfaction of the judicial conscience of the Court, that the disability suffered by the cadet was neither attributable nor was aggravated on account of military service.”

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Although the general rule is that a Criminal Court lacks jurisdiction to recall its own orders, it cannot be ignored that the dismissal of the anticipatory bail application of the accused persons occurred in circumstances that warranted reconsideration.”

Continue reading
Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that it failed to understand how the respondents could have retained the amounts deposited by the petitioner at the time of preferring the appeal and seeking stay of demand, after the appeal is decided, and matter is remitted back, and fresh assessment order is passed.

Continue reading
section 106 evidence act
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Court found that circumstances in the instant case constituted more than a prima facie case to enable the prosecution to invoke Section 106 of the Evidence Act and shift the burden on the accused husband to explain what had happened on the day & date his wife died.

Continue reading