Kerala HC | Appointment of 3 Additional Judges to be Judges
President appoints the following 3 Additional Judges to be the Judges of Kerala High Court: Justice Ashok Menon Justice Annie John Justice
Judges
Recommendation for appointment of 3 Addl. Judges of Chhattisgarh HC as Permanent — Reiterated by SC Collegium
Proposal for appointment of following three Additional Judges of the Chhattisgarh High Court, as Permanent Judges of that High Court: 1. Justice
Collegium recommends for elevation of 2 Advocates of Rajasthan HC as Judges
Proposal for appointment of following 9 Advocates as Judges of the Rajasthan High Court, but only 2 Judges were recommended to be
Collegium Resolution | Recommendation for elevation of 4 Advocates of A.P. HC & 3 of Telangana HC as Judges
Proposal for the appointment of following 4 Advocates as Judges of the Andhra Pradesh High Court and 3 Advocates as Judges of
SC Collegium Recommendation | Elevation of 5 Advocates of P&H HC as Judges
Proposal for appointment of 8 Advocates, as Judges of the Punjab & Haryana High Court: 1. Shri Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, 2. Shri
Collegium Resolution | 6 Advocates of the Calcutta HC to be elevated as Judges
Proposal for the appointment of following 9 Advocates as Judges of the Calcutta High Court: Advocates 1. Dibyendra Narayana Ray 2. Jaytosh
Madhya Pradesh HC | Orders of appointment of Vishal Dhagat and Vishal Mishra as Judges
President appointed (i) Shri Vishal Dhagat and (ii) Shri Vishal Mishra, to be Judges of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, in that
SC Collegium recommends 4 Judicial Officers to be appointed as Judges of Delhi HC
Proposal for appointment of following four Judicial Officers as Judges of the Delhi High Court: Shri Talwant Singh, Rajnish Bhatnagar Ms Asha
Jharkhand HC | Appointment of 2 Additional Judges as Judges
President appoints Justice Bimlendu Bhushan Mangalmurti and Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary, Additional Judges of the Jharkhand High Court to be Judges of
Rajasthan HC | 2 Judicial Officers of Rajasthan HC appointed as Judges
President appoints the following two Judicial Officers to be the Judges of Rajasthan High Court while exercising the powers conferred by clause
Patna HC | Four Lawyers appointed as Judges of the Patna High Court
President appoints the following four lawyers as the Judges of Patna High Court: Anjani Kumar Sharan Anil Kumar Sinha Prabhat Kumar Singh
Pat HC | Bihar Superior Judicial Service Rules: Annual recruitment of Judges is discretionary to some extent
Patna High Court: The Bench of Amreshwar Pratap Sahi and Anjana Mishra, JJ. dismissed a petition challenging the age requirements for District
Judge has to be protected from vexatious charges and malicious litigations; Judge of Court of Record cannot be tried for committing contempt of his own Court
Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sudhanshu Dhulia and Rajiv Sharma, JJ., dismissed a contempt petition against a ‘Judge of
Centre notifies new model code of rules for appointment of Judges to consumer fora
To dispose of pending consumer cases more smoothly, the Central Governement has notified a new model code of rules for appointment of
Three new appointments to the UK’s top appeal court
Lady Justice Arden DBE and Lord Justice Kitchin will join the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom as Justices on 1 October
Judges of Fast Track courts can’t be denied pensionary & other retiral benefits: SC
Supreme Court: In the case where the question as to whether the services rendered by some Judicial Officers as Fast Track court
Subordinate judges to get 30% pay hike on basic pay as interim relief
Supreme Court: The Bench of J. Chelameswar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ directed the States to implement the recommendations of the Commission
Appointment of Judges, Allahabad High Court
The President in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 217 of the Constitution of India appointed Justice Mukhtar
Appeal against decree in partition suit languishing for 30 years, heard by 75 Judges, termed unfortunate
Delhi High Court: Disposing of an appeal filed in 1985 against a judgment and decree in a partition suit, the Court observed