HIGH COURT JANUARY 2025 WEEKLY ROUNDUP| Stories on Bhupendrasinh Zala; Police Protection to Live-In Couple; WIPRO’s Trade Mark; Rangarajan Narasimhan; and more
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
Justice C.T. Ravikumar’s journey from a young graduate in Zoology to a distinguished judge of the Supreme Court exemplifies his dedication, passion, and exceptional legal prowess and serves as an inspiration for aspiring legal professionals.
Disaster Management Act mandates the State Government to take necessary measures for disaster management, which includes both immediate relief and long-term recovery efforts.
‘Pappanji’ typically refers to a large effigy, often constructed as part of local New Year or cultural celebrations in Kerala, particularly in places like Kochi. The effigy, often representing an exaggerated figure or caricature, is burned as a symbolic gesture to mark the end of the old year and to usher in the new one.
“It merits notice that the phraseology used in Section 273B of the IT Act is such that no penalty can be imposed on an assessee under Section 271B for breach of the provisions, if he proves that there was ‘reasonable cause’ for the said failure.”
“The display of photographs of defaulting borrowers violates their dignity, reputation, and fundamental right to life, as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India”
Kerala High Court expressed deep concern over the situation, calling it an embarrassment for the entire city to witness such a massive accumulation of waste without any action taken to remove it.
“This matter requires serious and urgent consideration, in consultation with the stakeholders”
“ESIC’s insistence on an emergency certificate to process the petitioner wife’s claim is untenable and hyper-technical”
“It is a well-accepted principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception.”
A Nodal Officer has been appointed in the Malayalam Film Industry Case for complainants receiving threatening calls and those who had not filed complaints before the Justice Hema Committee.
“There is no contradiction in as much as the deceased could be a devout Christian and yet wished to donate his body to science.”
The case revolves around a controversial speech made by the former MP comparing certain lawyers to street dogs at a time when there was strife between the lawyers and journalists in Kerala.
“A prosecution witness, who was examined already, cannot be recalled by exercising the powers under Section 233 CrPC. However, such an exercise can be done under Section 311 CrPC at any stage, including that of Section 233, provided all the requirements and parameters of Section 311 are otherwise satisfied.”
“Hearing these cases, we realize how much rigid gender roles and patriarchy have trickled down into societies and guide our thoughts and actions, even in ways we do not understand, at times. We unfortunately continue to follow and perpetuate such unconsciously, which surely warrants continuous education and close introspection.”
“Based on the statement of a lady, that also after 17 years, the present case is registered. It is true that the investigation is going on. But, everybody must remember that the pride and dignity is not only to woman, but to men also.”
“Under Section 173(1) of BNSS, the police cannot refuse to register an FIR on the ground of “not having territorial jurisdiction” over the offence for the reason that some part of the offence was committed outside the local jurisdiction of that concerned police station.”
There is a difference between entertainability and maintainability of a writ petition. Powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be exercised in restricted circumstances and within well-defined parameters, even if there exists an alternate remedy.
The Court questioned the authorities as to why the initial FIR was lodged only against the former Secretary and the recovery proceedings were referred to the joint secretary who had no authority.
“The nature and location of the injuries inflicted, the choice of weapon, and the circumstances of the attack unequivocally establish the liability of the convict for causing the death of the deceased.”