data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fb56/5fb569ef3e81547b7c91629c713cef900a8b57d1" alt="China Development Bank"
Supreme Court’s Ruling in China Development Bank Creates Further Confusion on Third-Party Securities
by Prachi Johri* and Rishi Thakur**
by Prachi Johri* and Rishi Thakur**
Editorial Board to the NLS Business Law Review is calling for submissions for Volume 11(2) of the Journal
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (“CAM”) advised Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL)
“The essence of the IBC lies in resolving insolvency matters through a process driven approach, and any deviation from its prescribed scope would undermine the legislative intent of the Code.”
“Decision taken by the CoC for liquidation in commercial wisdom of the CoC should not be interfered with by the Adjudicating Authority.”
The NCLT held that non-delivery of possession despite payments and continued acknowledgment of liability through emails and communications proved default under Section 7 IBC.
The NCLT held that the Resolution Professional does not have adjudicatory powers to invalidate or challenge the charges based on an absence of NOC.
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM) advised IDFC Limited (“IDFC”) and IDFC Financial Holding Company Limited (“IDFC FHC”)
The instant matter revolved around a deadlock in management caused by alleged financial mismanagement and oppressive actions by the respondents.
NCLT held that the Resolution Professional followed the principles of Natural Justice and considered relevant documents, therefore, the Personal Insolvency Resolution Process should be initiated.
“The term “personal guarantor” is defined under Section 5(22) of the IBC as “personal guarantor” means an individual who is the surety in a contract of guarantee to a corporate debtor.”
“A provision vesting “inherent powers” on a Court or Tribunal are to be used sparingly and should not be used to imply and read in substantive powers where the statue itself does not prescribe such powers.”
The NCLT noted that Form AA, meant for individual Insolvency Professionals, had been modified by the Insolvency Professional Entity to fit its consent as no separate form for IPEs exists.
Interviewed by K V Vinaya
by Anuja Pethia* and Rishabh Govila**
The NCLT stated that the petitioner neither had a direct contractual relationship with the respondent, nor was the respondent provided with any goods/services, thereby disqualifying them as an operational creditor.
The NCLT ordered the respondents to maintain the status quo regarding existing shareholders and their shareholding.
The application is filed by Jammu and Kashmir Bank against the Himalayan Mineral Waters Private Limited for a total financial debt of Rs. 50,04,38,456/- for the credit facilities availed by Leel Electricals.
The Merger scheme aims to restructure and streamline the operations of the applicant companies to achieve operational efficiencies and facilitate future growth and expected to create synergies, reduce costs, and create value for shareholders of the involved entities.