Trade Mark
Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction in favour of Dream 11 in a trade mark infringement suit
Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction in favour of Dream 11 against the person who was operating under the domain name ‘www.dream11.bet’ and held that the domain name adopted by the defendant was deceptively similar to that of the plaintiffs and was clearly intended to ride on the goodwill and reputation of the plaintiff’s marks.
Delhi High Court grants ex-parte ad-interim injunction to Tata Sia Airlines Limited in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains Vistara Media Private Limited from using the mark ‘VISTARA’
Delhi High Court: In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and
Delhi High Court confirms ad-interim ex-parte order of injunction passed in favour of Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. for its mark ‘FORZEST’; Cost of Rs. 10 lakhs imposed for concealing material facts
Delhi High Court: In a trade mark infringement case where the ex-parte ad-interim order of injunction was challenged, the Single
Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction along with 2 lakhs damages in favour of eBay in a trade mark infringement suit
Delhi High Court: In a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark ‘Shopibay’ which was similar
Delhi High Court directs Amazon to take down Pakistani Rooh Afza from its website; grants permanent injunction to the Hamdard Group
Delhi High Court: While deciding a case related to the product and mark ‘ROOH AFZA’, the Single Judge Bench of
Criminal Trade Mark Infringement for Medicines – An Ineffective Remedy
by Murali Neelakantan†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 20
[Trademark Dispute] Kar HC | A case of deceptively similar trademarks; Quintessential ‘Common man’ is neither blessed with the wisdom of Solomon nor the trained eyes of Sherlock Holmes
Karnataka High Court: P. Krishna Bhat J., set aside the impugned order with a direction to the Court to hear and dispose
Bom HC | Does Copyright Act requires mandatory registration to seek protection under the Act? Justice G.S. Patel explains
“Copyright Act gives a range of rights and privileges to the first owner of copyright without requiring prior registration.”
Delhi High Court rejects trademark injunction sought by pharmaceutical company creating Typhoid vaccines
Delhi High Court: V. Kameswar Rao J. rejected an application for permanent injunction by a pharmaceutical company against a rival brand, seeking
Madras HC | Patanjali restrained from using Trademark ‘CORONIL’ till 30th July, 2020
Madras High Court: C. V. Karthikeyan, J., granted temporary injunction and restrained “Patanjali” from using the word ‘CORONIL’ as the plaintiff has the
Sections 85 (2) (b) and 85 (3) (a) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 declared unconstitutional
Madras High Court: In a petition filed for the scrutiny of Section 85 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 dealing with the qualification
“Make My Trip (India) Pvt. Ltd.” was granted interim injunction restraining usage of its Trade mark and logo
Delhi High Court: In a huge relief to the “Make my trip (India) Pvt.Ltd”, a pioneer in online travel industry, who had
Trade Marks (Amendment) Rules, 2014
The Central Government vide notification dated August 1, 2014, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 157 (1); & (2) of