Elevation of 13 Advocates as Judges in Allahabad HC: SC Collegium approves
Elevation of 13 Advocates as Judges in Allahabad HC Supreme Court Collegium has approved the proposal for elevation of the following Advocates
Advocates
SC Collegium approves proposal for elevation of 4 Advocates as Judges of Punjab and Haryana HC
Elevation of 4 Advocates as Judges of Punjab and Haryana High Court Supreme Court Collegium has approved the proposal for elevation of
Proposal for elevation of 3 Advocates & 2 Judicial Officers as Judges of Gauhati HC: SC Collegium approves
Elevation of 3 Advocates and 2 Judicial Officers as Judges of Gauhati HC Supreme Court Collegium has approved the proposal for elevation
SC Collegium approves elevation of 4 Advocates as Judges of Madras HC
SC Collegium has approved elevation of 4 Advocates as Judges of Madras HC Supreme Court Collegium has approved the proposal for elevation
SC Collegium | Proposal for elevation of 4 Advocates & 4 Judicial Officers approved as Judges of Kerala HC
SC Collegium approves proposal for elevation of 4 Advocates & 4 Judicial Officers as Judges in Kerala HC Supreme Court Collegium has
Elevation of 2 Advocates and 4 Judicial Officers as Judges: SC Collegium recommends
Calcutta High Court | Elevation of 2 Advocates and 4 Judicial Officers as Judges Supreme Court Collegium has approved the proposal for
Supreme Court Collegium recommends elevation of 3 Advocates & 3 Judicial Officers as Judges of Raj HC
Rajasthan High Court | Elevation of Advocates and Judicial Officers as Judges Supreme Court Collegium approved the proposal for elevation of the
Representation by Advocates before Labour Courts: Del HC reiterates there is no absolute bar
Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J., while reiterating that there is no absolute bar on legal practitioners representing Management before Labour Courts,
Del HC | CM Advocates Welfare Scheme: Only for the Advocates enrolled with Voter ID of Delhi? HC enumerates significance of Place of Practice v. Place of Residence
Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J., remarked that, Insurance for lawyers has been an aspiration for several years. In the present
MP HC | Whether Advocates who appear on behalf of agencies like CBI, ED etc. before HC and lower Courts, appointed by process of consultation with HC, in terms of S. 24(1) and 24(4) of CrPC? Court seeks clarification from State
Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq, CJ. and Vijay Kumar Shukla, J., heard a petition which was in
Significance of ‘suo motu’ action under S. 35 of Advocates Act | Synoptic report of Madras HC decision on power and mechanism of Bar Council to take action against erring Advocates
Lady Justice is the allegorical personification of the moral force in judicial systems. Her attributes are a blindfold, a beam balance, and a sword and the balance denotes that justice needs to be delivered with eyes closed and ears open.
Madras HC | Is there any mechanism to take action against members of legal fraternity for their misbehaviour with officials on duty? Bar council of Tamil Nadu to respond
Madras High Court: M. Dhandapani, J., stated that the Court has noticed where the legal fraternity has indulged in some high-handed activity
Del HC | Movement of Advocates allowed during curfew on production of valid Bar ID Card; No officer of any authority shall humiliate Advocates on production of valid ID Card
Delhi High Court: Suresh Kumar Sait, J., held that any authority whosoever shall not stop any advocate in NCT of Delhi if
Ori HC│Exercise of suo motu power by Orissa High Court for designation of “Senior Advocates” ultravires the guidelines laid down Indira Jaising case; Power to Add/Delete/Modify in Rules lies only with Supreme Court
Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of Chitta Ranjan Dash and Pramath Patnaik JJ. held sub-rule (9) of Rule- 6 of the
MP HC| Advocate, located anywhere in the State, may apply for passes for himself or his staff, for attending office during the ongoing lockdown
Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq, CJ., and Atul Sreedharan, J., decided over a writ petition which was
Supreme Court Collegium | Proposal for elevation of Advocates as Judges in Madhya Pradesh, Punjab and Haryana & Jammu and Kashmir HC approved
Collegium Statement Supreme Court Collegium has approved the proposal for elevation of the following Advocates as Judges in the High Courts: High
Supreme Court Collegium reiterates recommendation for elevation of Advocates as Judges in Kerala, Karnataka and Himachal Pradesh High Courts
Collegium Statement Supreme Court collegium reiterates its recommendations for the elevation of the following Advocates as Judges in High Courts: High Courts
Carry only Bare Acts, without notes: BCI says no books, notes, study material allowed in examination hall, AIBE XVI onwards
Bar Council of India has notified that AIBE XVI onwards — No books, notes or study material will be allowed in the
Madras HC | Zero tolerance for Advocates’ unlawful conduct: HC to ensure that activities of some advocates do not spoil image of entire profession
Madras High Court: N. Anand Venkatesh, J., while addressing the present petition expressed that: “This is the third occasion, in the last
BCI decides to hold next All India Bar Examination on 21st March, 2021; No change in dates for AIBE–XV
Bar Council of India decided to hold the next All India Bar Exam on 21-03-2021. AIBE-XV is to be held on the