Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
The Arbitrator was, therefore, not justified in undertaking interpretation of the contractual terms contrary to language used therein, which merely mirrored the policy decisions of the Railway Board which were binding in nature”.
“The arbitration agreement must be interpreted in a purposive manner, but not literally so as to enable the parties to pursue the intended dispute redressal mechanism of contract”.
The ruling reinforces custodial accountability in virtual digital asset operations and upholds the Tribunal’s balanced protective measures.
Justice Philip Jeyaretnam’s keynote was not merely an academic exploration of legal principles; it was a practical and thought-provoking call for reform. His message resonated strongly with the day’s central theme: ensuring that construction disputes are resolved not just efficiently, but equitably, through disciplined, forward-thinking processes.
“It was not disputed that the plaintiff’s prayer in the suit for recovery of the amount would be arbitrable. However, the plaintiff also sought redemption of mortgages executed in its favour and this was where the plaintiff claimed that the said claim was not arbitrable.”
2025 SCC Vol. 8 Part 2: Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases on Arbitration, Constitution, Criminal Law, and Customs.
At the Nani Palkhivala Arbitration Centre’s panel on “Finality of Arbitral Awards: Principle, Practice and Pitfalls” during India ADR Week 2025, Raunaq B. Mathur, Partner at Saraf & Partners emphasised the evolving judicial approach to arbitral awards.
In this training session organised by Delos Dispute Resolution, the eminent panellists, comprising different legal professionals, discussed the structure, essentials, and considerations of an arbitral award.
A panel discussion was organised by SAM, Arbitral Women, and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr on the proposed amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, via the 2024 draft bill as a precursor to the Delhi Arbitration Weekend.
Join judges, leading practitioners, scholars, and arbitration experts from across the globe at the 3rd Edition of Delhi Arbitration Weekend 2025 (DAW), a premier international forum designed to advance dialogue, share best practices, and highlight India’s pivotal role in shaping the future of global arbitration.
As a part of DAW 2025, an external event organized by The International Bar Association in collaboration with Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co., One Essex Court, and Osborne Partners, this report summarises the keynote address by Justice K.V. Viswanathan and the panel discussion by industry experts. The discussion delved into key challenges and evolving trends in arbitration, emphasising the importance of impartiality, transparency, and ethical standards.
2025 SCC Vol. 7 Part 4: Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases on Arbitration, Judiciary, Insolvency and Bankruptcy, Land Acquisition, and Service Law.
2025 SCC Vol. 7 Part 1: Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases on Consumer Protection, Arbitration, Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, and Digital KYC.
2025 SCC Vol. 6 Part 4: Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases on Constitution, Contract and Specific Relief, Arbitration, Enemy Property, IBC, Education Law, and Criminal Law.
Whether you’re a legal professional, construction consultant, or industry stakeholder, this course is tailored to deepen your understanding of dispute resolution and arbitration in construction projects.
As the third edition of Delhi Arbitration Weekend (September 18—21, 2025) unfolds, DAW not only cements its stature as a leading arbitration forum but also marks a pivotal evolution in the Asia‑Pacific arbitration landscape, drawing expanded participation from preeminent global institutions such as SIAC, ICC, ICSID, and PCA.
Stay informed on the latest Supreme Court judgments of July 2025 on Bihar’s Electoral Roll revision, recording of spousal conversations; Tribal woman’s rights over ancestral property; Guidelines on collection of DNA evidence and mental health of college students. Explore notable rulings shaping the legal landscape.
“Time-barred claims must not be excluded from conciliation under the MSMED Act. The statute of limitation only bars the remedy but does not extinguish the underlying right”.
“Similarly, a clause which states that “if the parties so decide, the disputes shall be referred to arbitration” or “any disputes between parties, if they so agree, shall be referred to arbitration” would not constitute an arbitration agreement”.