Mere change of address in IT return is not enough; Assessing Officer must be specifically intimated
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of UU Lalit, Indira Banerjee and MR Shah, JJ has held that mere mentioning of the new
Assessing officer
Del HC | Reassessment order quashed for non-compliance of ‘sacrosanct’ procedure laid down by SC in GKN Driveshafts case
Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of Dr S. Muralidhar and Talwant Singh, JJ. quashed an order of reassessment passed by the Assessing
ITAT| Assessee must be given adequate opportunity to prove the receipt of share capital/premium
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (ITAT): In a case related to bogus Share Capital/Premium, the Accountant Member RK Panda took note of
Karnataka HC rules that the power of ITAT to make an order is not limited to the grounds of appeal
Karnataka High Court: A Division Judge Bench comprising of Vineet Kothari and S. Sujatha, JJ., decided an Income Tax Appeal wherein it