data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54d11/54d11a79daa5d1116b38d5c3949ac85bfef85135" alt="Tax Investigators can Adjudicate"
CBEC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54d11/54d11a79daa5d1116b38d5c3949ac85bfef85135" alt="Tax Investigators can Adjudicate"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bdee/8bdeeee4005b6032c4a92ac5d910c21fe93007e2" alt="Madras High Court"
Madras High Court examines the scope and ambit of S. 174 of CGST Act in context of Notifications issued under the repealed tax regime
The practice and procedure, both pre and post GST are consistent and involve participation of the officer of the DGGI in issuance of show cause notices.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59168/59168408aacc08b5378a57e8d705f0e64f6e259e" alt="Invocation of incorrect methodology"
Supreme Court| Invocation of incorrect methodology for arriving at assessable value is immaterial to show cause notice’s validity, provided that the power itself existed
Supreme Court held that the CBEC circular was not contrary to the intent of the Central Excise Act and Rules. Thus, the show cause notice is not defective and unenforceable. However, the order of the Commissioner regarding the value of the goods sold to the Assessee’s sister concerns is in consonance with the Court’s earlier judgments and CBEC Circular.