CESTAT | Admissibility of the Cenvat Credit in respect of outward GTA; Tribunal allows appeal
Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) and Raju (Technical member) allowed an appeal
CENVAT credit
CESTAT | No entitlement of Cenvat credit on Outdoor catering service; Tribunal partly allows appeal
Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): S.S. Garg (Judicial Member) partially allowed an appeal against the confirmation order of Commissioner
CESTAT | Nexus between services and business activities to be established in order to avail Cenvat Credit; Tribunal allows appeal
Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal which was filed against the impugned order
CESTAT | Whether place of providing service play any role in entitlement of Cenvat Credit? Tribunal answers
Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal which was filed against the denial order
CESTAT | “At the time of entertaining the refund claim, the issue of admissibility of the CENVAT credit cannot be raised”: Tribunal allows appeal
Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal which was filed against the impugned orders
CESTAT | Demand of reversal Cenvat Credit, Interest, and Imposition of penalty set aside; Tribunal allows appeal in matter of Central Excise (Removal of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable Goods) Rule 2001
Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Ramesh Nair (Judicial Member) and Raju (Technical Member) allowed an appeal
CESTAT | Whether Cenvat credit of service tax paid on the deposit insurance service provided by the DICGC available; Tribunal explains while allowing appeal
Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ajay Sharma (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal which was filed challenging the order passed
CESTAT | Whether a by-product from a factory be considered as manufactured goods and should it fall under ‘excisable goods’ or ‘exempted goods’ as provided in R. 2(d) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004; Tribunal answers while dismissing appeal
Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): The Coram of Dilip Gupta (President) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) dismissed an
CESTAT | Amount already reversed before introduction of CGST Act 2017 entitled to be re-credited; Tribunal allows appeal
Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): Ashok Jindal (Judicial Member) allowed an appeal filed against the impugned order wherein the
CESTAT | All the services in question are eligible input services for rendering of output services; Tribunal allows appeal entitling appellant to input service credit
Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): A Coram of Anil Chaudhary (Judicial Member) and C.L. Mahar (Technical Member), allowed an
CESTAT | Direct nexus between an input service and an output service is sufficient to claim refund on the said input service if claimant is engaged in export of the same
Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellant Tribunal (CESTAT): S.S. Garg (Judicial Member) remanded the matter to its original authority where the appellants
CESTAT | When sale takes at buyer’s premise, the place of removal is that place itself for assessing CENVAT credit
Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): This appeal was filed before Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member. Facts of the case were
CESTAT | Mere non-disclosure of particulars cannot be concluded as willful suppression in order to invoke extended period
Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): This appeal was filed before Sulekha Beevi, J. and Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical).
CESTAT | Mere failure to declare information does not amount to willful misdeclaration unless deliberate attempt to evade duty found
Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT): This appeal was filed before S.S. Garg, J., directed against the order passed by