CESTAT | Company providing service to member companies without consideration not liable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS)
Suchita Shukla, Editorial Assistant has put this story together
CESTAT
Jhar HC | Mandatory pre-deposit not to be waived off by Court under amended S. 35-F, Central Excise Act until exceptional grounds of undue financial hardships is proved beyond doubt
Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together
Guj HC | Goods seized by Customs Authority can be released after imposing fine and subjecting the party concerned to certain conditions
Gujarat High Court: A Division Bench of Harsha Devani and Bhargav D. Karia, JJ. partially allowed a stay order for the release
Bom | CESTAT to exercise appellate jurisdiction as a fact finding authority; ‘cryptic order’ with a single observation set aside
Bombay High Court: S.C. Dharmadhikari and M.S. Karnik, JJ., allowed an appeal filed by the Commissioner of GST against the order of
Bom HC | ‘Dominant user’ of construction in question to be seen while considering application of Section 65 (2-b) of Finance Act, 1994
Bombay High Court: S.C. Dharamadhikari and M.S. Karnik, JJ., dismissed an appeal filed against the order passed by Central Excise and Service Tax
Term “allowed to be sold in India” under Proviso to S. 3(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944 applicable only to sales made in DTA of the production by 100% EOUs
Supreme Court: Hearing the appeal where the question was that whether the appellant was eligible to clear goods up to a certain