data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84af3/84af395e7ad8554a44365fff1bdefee7e1fa3695" alt="Affidavit Evidence in India"
civil procedure code
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84af3/84af395e7ad8554a44365fff1bdefee7e1fa3695" alt="Affidavit Evidence in India"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dae96/dae965d08581f7fca45734ffbbc36b3505e30c76" alt="2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 5"
2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 5
Advocates Act, 1961 — S. 24(1)(f) — Enrolment Fees: Charging of enrolment fees in excess of statutory stipulation under Advocates Act, 1961
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbd9e/cbd9e9251f25b8e61742bc282f55f70cea89cc74" alt="Order II Rule 2 CPC"
Supreme Court breaks down Order II Rule 2 of CPC, discusses general principles underlying its operation
“The stage at which the first suit is, would not be a material consideration in deciding the applicability of the bar under Order II Rule 2. What needs to be looked into is whether the cause of action in both suits is one and the same in substance, and whether the plaintiff is agitating the second suit for claiming a relief that was very well available to him at the time of filing the first suit.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8c4f/a8c4fd549bc3d6770b61fb96f805ce8ad9452cf3" alt="Balancing Flexibility and Efficiency"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2845/f2845f69e28e29a81eb7ae4b4c007177dc554735" alt="2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 1"
2024 SCC Vol. 9 Part 1
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 7 R. 11(d) — Suit or application whether barred by limitation — When no limitation provided for — Power
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a004a/a004aebbf5d6544c750a8625c1f74c177d46b112" alt="Balancing Expediency and Justice"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d920a/d920a1d51479d83a248f1e644d4d04544830f0a5" alt="Malak Bhatt"
In Conversation with Malak Bhatt: Exploring the Dynamics of White-Collar Crime and Insolvency Law
Interviewed by Zoya Ahmad
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50456/504565236e3b267c7af7f484eeae6222231ac0e7" alt="2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 3"
2024 SCC Vol. 8 Part 3
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 43 R. 1(r) — Infructuous/Futile appeal: Appeal against interim order
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c611/5c611a690f4bffce4624438c0131ea882e4ecd50" alt="Adopting Audio-Video Recording"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/150bf/150bf4efb112d4c1c44ccbea39b0df5ca435f5c6" alt="Cases Reported in HCC"
Cases Reported in HCC
Civil Procedure Code, 1908—Or. 7 R. 11—Rejection of plaint — Appeal against Trial Court’s decision allowing application for rejection
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/614d5/614d50a889d235f39374950a072282ef0a9fe740" alt="Shri Late Karavadi Venkateswarlu"
Call for Papers for Competition in commemoration of Shri Late Karavadi Venkateswarlu
The theme of the competition is The Cardinal Concepts of Civil Procedure Code; a Critique or Critical Analysis on Their Evolution and Crystallization
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00cff/00cffb5d68b07c4e05255e0dd136cd760fc99762" alt="Delhi High Court"
Delhi High Court imposes costs on MCD for delay in filing written statement impacting senior citizen’s case
The Court observed that MCD is a big Government Department, and this civic agency must be handling innumerable matters but that does not give any automatic handle to MCD to file written statement as per its own whims and fancies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00cff/00cffb5d68b07c4e05255e0dd136cd760fc99762" alt="Delhi High Court"
Delhi High Court orders SpiceJet to return all aircrafts along with engines to TWC
“If the engines are not returned and properly serviced, TWC Aviation Capital Ltd. would suffer irreparable harm, as this could cause irreversible damage to the engines.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c76d/3c76d55225cec4ee90b6d579088b83071c62ae65" alt="2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5"
2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 5
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 6 R. 17 — Amendment of plaint: Principles summarized re when amendment of plaint is permissible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ac11/4ac117131374d03f87187230d249ed8aef5475a0" alt="2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 3"
2024 SCC Vol. 3 Part 3
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 75(c), Or. 26 Rr. 10-A, 9 and 10: Direction of trial court to Director of Archaeological
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00cff/00cffb5d68b07c4e05255e0dd136cd760fc99762" alt="Delhi High Court"
Issue of limitation cannot be decided without recording of evidence, once it becomes a mixed question of law and fact: Delhi High Court upholds Trial Court’s dismissal of Order 7 Rule 11
Delhi High Court held that the dismissal of the petitioner’s application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was warranted, emphasizing the need to focus solely on the allegations in the plaint at the preliminary stage because the issues regarding limitation and adverse possession required further evidence and examination, which could not be resolved without a full trial.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83c5b/83c5b110f559b3d4a9e6460263a2ab92479b9d35" alt="2023 SCC Vol. 10 Part 5"
2023 SCC Vol. 10 Part 5
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 11 — Res judicata: Only determinations which are essential or fundamental to the substantive decision, and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31d8b/31d8b8f89345cedac5789743796631a98e2eb681" alt="2023 SCC Vol. 10 Part 4"
2023 SCC Vol. 10 Part 4
Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003 — S. 25 r/w FR 56 — Tenure of Director of Enforcement: Permissibility of continuation of tenure
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09101/091019559eb4bfd96c1733cc117fd72aad1160bd" alt="bombay high court"
Bombay High Court refuses to set aside injunction order passed in favour of Marico Limited product under its brand Parachute
It is no defence to state that others have also infringing the marks/labels of the Plaintiff as the Defendant cannot seek shelter behind other infringers or potential infringers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f7e3/0f7e3890dd7bfef5fc95d2c41bb4705aa8b803e3" alt="2023 SCC Vol. 9 Part 5"
2023 SCC Vol. 9 Part 5
Border Security Force Rules, 1969 — Rr. 142, 143, 43, 45, 48, 49, Appendices IV and VI: Strict adherence to procedural safeguards