Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
In Lulu v. Coolulu trademark dispute, the Karnataka High Court chided the competent authority for not considering the nuances of the dispute properly, which meant that the impugned order did not show even a semblence of application of mind.
Delhi High Court observed that in absence of any cogent, supervening circumstances necessitating cancellation of bail of the respondent/accused, the Court cannot merely cancel the bail so granted.
JSS Law College, Autonomous, Mysuru and Surana & Surana, International Attorneys cordially invite you to compete in the 20th Surana & Surana
Madras High Court reiterated that wearing “gown” is only optional and not mandatory before any Courts other than the Supreme Court or the High Courts. Thus, it held that the order of the National Company Law Board imposing a dress code for Advocates for appearance before the Tribunal is without authority and hence, illegal.
by Tushar Behl† and Shreshtha Garge††
Devna Arora* and Didon Misri**
Calcutta High Court | Krishna Rao, J., held that under Companies Act, 2013, Civil Courts have jurisdiction to enquire into
In a matter relating to criminal proceedings against Reliance Industries, SEBI had failed to comply with the Supreme Court’s order directing it to furnish a copy of documents, leading to initiation of contempt proceedings against SEBI.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 14(1)(a) and 2(1)(e) r/w Ss. 11(5) and 11(6) — Application seeking termination of
by Akaant Kumar Mittal†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 83
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 7, 8 and 11 — Essential requirements of arbitration agreement: When there is discernible intention
Calcutta High Court | While dismissing a writ petition challenging the capacity of Registrar of Companies (ROC) to initiate multiple/
by Kritika Krishnamurthy† and Tapasi Mohapatra††
Supreme Court: In a case where the appellant challenged the forfeiture of his office of Director for allegedly entering into a contract
by Akaant Kumar Mittal†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 81
by Abhijnan Jha* and Urvashi Misra**
“Such unscrambling of the resolution process will not only prove time-consuming, but may also adversely affect the agreed realized gains to the retail debenture holders, who have already consented to the negotiated settlement before the High Court.”
The Central Government has notified the Companies (Registration of Charges) Second Amendment Rules, 2022 to amend the Companies (Removal of Names of