Making a case of cartelisation
by Harshita Fatesaria†, Sakshi Saran Agarwal†† and Shourya Bhansali†††
Competition Act
CCI | Can BCI be covered under the ambit of an ‘enterprise’ under S. 2(h) of Competition Act? Read why it was asserted that BCI misused its dominant position
Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Coram comprising of Ashok Kumar Gupta (Chairperson) and Sangeeta Verma and Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi (Members), considered
Small Time Cartels: The Robin Hood We Need?
by Soham Bhalerao[1] and Disha Gujarathi[2]
CCI | Whether Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) is an enterprise under S. 2(h) of Competition Act? DMRC activities sovereign or economic? Read on
Competition Commission of India (CCI): The coram of Ashok Kumar Gupta (Chairperson) and Sangeeta Verma and Bhagwant Singh Bishnoi, Members expressed that
Ola, Uber do not facilitate cartelization or anti-competitive practices between drivers, holds SC but says no to imposing “heavy cost” on the informant
“When the CCI performs inquisitorial, as opposed to adjudicatory functions, the doors of approaching the CCI and the appellate authority, i.e., the NCLAT, must be kept wide open in public interest.”
More Power to CCI — The Delhi HC upholds the CCIs Jurisdiction to probe against Monsanto’s abusive practices
Anshuman Sakle, Partner, Ruchi Verma, Associate and Nandini Pahari,Associate, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
Cite as: (2020) PL (Comp. L) July 61
CCI | MSMEs indulging in cartelization in the Composite Brake Blocks (CBB) market in India, cautioned to refrain from indulging in such malpractices in future
Competition Commission of India (CCI): While deciding the instant matter which revolved around violation of Section 3 (3) of the Competition Act,
Analysing the Competition Law issues in the ambitious Jio-Facebook deal
by Samanvi Narang and Prateek Gupta*
COVID-19 | Lockdown | NCLAT extends period of limitation applicable to pending proceedings/ interim orders, and directs banks to extend periods of Fixed Deposits
Upon requests for urgent listing of cases having been made telephonically to Registrar of this Appellate Tribunal from various persons, who were
Exemption Notification | Banking Co. exempted from application of Ss. 5 & 6 of Competition Act, 2002 for a period of 5 years
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of section 54 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the Central
Excessive Pricing in India: To Regulate or Not
Bhumesh Verma, Managing Partner and
Abhishar Vidyarthi, Student Researcher, Corp Comm Legal
Cite as: (2020) PL (CL) January 79
Supreme Court | TRAI and TDSAT to determine preliminary issues before CCI can decide competition issue
Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment of Bombay High Court
The Ninth Mile of Indian Competition: The Rebirthing to the Contemporary
by Priya & Karan Vijay*
Competition Act, 2002 not to be misunderstood with Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Competition Commission of India (CCI): A Four member bench comprising of Sudhir Mital, Chairperson and Augustine Peter, UC Nahta, members and GP
CCI reiterates principles for granting interim order under Section 33 of the Competition Act
Competition Commission of India (CCI): Disposing of an interim application under Section 33 of the Competition Act, 2002 (‘the Act’) by the
Section 4 of the Competition Act does not contemplate ‘Collective Dominance’; case of contravention not established against Ola, Uber
Competition Commission of India (CCI): A four-member bench comprising of Devender Kumar Sikri, Chairperson and Sudhir Mital, Augustine Peter and U.C. Nahata,
CCI issues order against Grasim Industries, Aditya Birla Chemicals and Gujarat Alkalies for bid rigging, costs imposed
Competition Commission of India: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has found Grasim Industries Limited (GIL), Aditya Birla Chemicals (India) Ltd. (ABCIL)
For applying S. 3 of Competition Act against an alleged anti-competitive practice, a prima facie case needs to be established first
Competition Commission of India: The CCI recently passed an order under Sec. 26(2) of the Competition Act wherein the informant had filed
CCI: Introductory offers of Reliance Jio does not amount to abuse of dominance position
Competition Commission of India: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) issued an order stating that Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited (RJIL) introductory offers