S. 147 of NI Act gives power to the court to accept settlement and quash the conviction
Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J., decided a criminal petition filed for quashing the
compromise
FIR quashed in light of compromise effected between parties
Punjab and Haryana High Court: FIR in cross cases filed between the contesting parties was quashed by a Single Judge Bench comprising
Criminal cases having overwhelmingly civil flavour can be quashed by High Court based on compromise between parties
Karnataka High Court: While deciding a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC, a Single Judge Bench comprising of K.N. Phannendra,
Compromise is not a concrete ground to quash FIR or criminal proceedings
Punjab and Haryana High Court: In a recent appeal before the High Court, it has held that a compromise between the parties
Compromise or amicable settlement of dispute between parties brings peace and harmony in society
Punjab and Haryana High Court: In two subsequent cases decided by the Bench of Inderjit, J., dealing with offences under Sections 420,
Compromise between parties in case of death by rash and negligent driving is not a ground to quash the offence u/S 304-A IPC
Kerala High Court: Dismissing the criminal miscellaneous case where the petitioner having been charged under Sections 304-A, 279 and 338 of the
Compromise between legal heir and offender in a case under S. 304-A IPC does not warrant quashing of proceedings
Punjab and Haryana High Court: Deciding on the matter of whether the crime registered under Section 304-A of Penal Code, 1860 can
Lesser sentence awarded to a rape convict in a two decade old case upon entering into a compromise with the victim
Supreme Court: In the present case, where the appellant was charged under Section 376 of IPC for committing rape upon a woman