data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2e15/e2e1595d10da29f38591d525f6dec0f36416b971" alt=""
‘General phraseology of a contract cannot constitute agreement to apply statutory amendments retrospectively’; SC holds contractual clauses cannot run contrary to legislative intent
Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh, JJ., held that a generally worded clause of a contract