Equal Pay for Equal Work | Equality is not to be based solely on designation or nature of work; J&K and Ladakh HC reiterates
The High Court stated that that the person who asserts that there is equality in work has to prove the same first.
equal pay for equal work
‘Equal pay for equal work’; Himachal Pradesh HC grants similar pay scale to an employee who was given different pay scale for discharging similar work in same cadre
“No tangible explanation has been offered by the respondents to justify the date of appointment becoming relevant for fixing different pay scales for discharging similar work in the same cadre.”
Classification of posts and determination of pay structure falls within Executive’s exclusive domain, Courts and Tribunals should not interfere; Supreme Court reiterates
“The wisdom and advisability of the Courts in the matters concerning the finance, are ordinarily not amenable to judicial review unless a gross case of arbitrariness or unfairness is established by the aggrieved party.”, observed Supreme Court
High Court Monthly Roundup| November 2022| 60+ Legal Stories including Default Bail, Babri Masjid Demolition, Kashmiriyat, Muzaffarnagar Riots and more
Allahabad High Court Allahabad High Court dismisses appeal against acquittal order in Babri Masjid Demolition Case In an appeal against
Allahabad High Court| Class IV Contractual Employees entitled to be paid same wages in accordance with the provisions of ‘equal pay for equal work’
Allahabad High Court: In a writ petition filed against the validity of the order which rejected petitioner’s representation and claim
Bom HC | Principle of “Equal Pay for Equal Work” does not operate in vacuum, it is not a fundamental right but a Constitutional goal depending on several factors
Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of Sunil B. Shukre and Rohit B. Deo, JJ., expressed its view that, The principle “Equal
[Equal Pay for Equal Work] ECJ holds TESCO stores are single-source/employer for its different distribution centers; pay gap between workers of a different sex can hit by EU laws
European Court of Justice (ECJ): The Second Chamber composed of A. Arabadjiev, President of the Chamber, A. Kumin, T. von Danwitz (Rapporteur),
Jhar HC | No discrimination to be made if the nature of job is same and performance are same or similar, Principle of ‘equal pay for equal work’ applied
Jharkhand High Court: S. N Pathak J., upheld the award applying the principle of equal pay for equal work. The facts of
Teachers are the backbone of education: Deprivation of pension is against constitutional mandate
Meghalaya High Court: The Bench comprising of Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ. and S.R. Sen, J. directed the government to adhere to the principles
Union of India asked to deliberate upon the issue of non-grant of equal pay for equal work to Armed Personnel
Supreme Court: Stating that the Court would fail in it’s duty if it did not took note of the grievance of the
‘Equal pay for equal work’ principle constitutes a clear and unambiguous right and is vested in every employee – whether engaged on regular or temporary basis
Supreme Court: Dealing with the question as to whether temporarily engaged employees (daily-wage employees, ad-hoc appointees, employees appointed on casual basis, contractual