Nottebohm Case Interpretation of Nationality under International Law
by Lavanya Agarwal*
by Lavanya Agarwal*
The Court stated that EC Regulation 261 provides a standardised level of compensation for passengers which does not require complex analysis. Requiring an enquiry into why, when and how a staff member became ill would be contrary to the intended operation of the scheme.
The ECJ stated that obligation to insert fingerprints into the storage medium of identity cards constitutes a limitation of the fundamental right to privacy and protection of personal data, which are guaranteed by the ECHR.
The dispute concerning Amazon’s use of its USA based website relates entirely to events that occurred before the UK left the European Union (Brexit) when UK trademark law at that time was substantially governed by EU legislation and case law.
In a pioneering step, the European Parliament on 13-03-2024, adopted 459-pages long Regulation drafted to ensure safety, compliance with fundamental rights and boost innovation.
by Varun Kumar† and Ishika Mittal††
“Special rules of jurisdiction laid down by the Brussels I bis Regulation are to be interpreted strictly and do not permit an interpretation which goes beyond the cases expressly envisaged by that regulation.”
by Ameya Gokhale†, Vaibhav Singh†† and Radhika Indapurkar†††
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 58
The Member of European Parliament adopted the EU’s AI Act with 499 votes in favour.
by Dr Srikant Parthasarathy† and Dr Amirthalakshmi R††
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 13
European Court of Justice: In a landmark ruling the Bench comprising A. Prechal (President), M.L. Arastey Sahún (Rapporteur), F. Biltgen, N. Wahl
“A person’s image constitutes one of the chief attributes of his or her personality as it reveals the person’s unique characteristics and distinguishes the person from others. The right to the protection of one’s image is thus one of the essential components of personal development and mainly presupposes that person’s control over the use of that image, including the right to refuse publication of it.”
“References to traditions, general assumptions or prevailing social attitudes in a particular country are insufficient justification for a difference in treatment on grounds of sex, whether in favour of women or men”
by Kritika Krishnamurthy† and Tapasi Mohapatra††
Court of Justice of the European Union (Second Chamber): In the instant dispute before the CJEU wherein the applicant's internship
The mistake of the patent agent would be similar to the mistake of an advocate who may be representing parties in any
by Sanjay Vashishtha†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 7
European Court of Justice: The Bench composed of K. Lenaerts, President, L. Bay Larsen, Vice-President, A. Arabadjiev, K. Jürimäe, C. Lycourgos, E.
Sucheta Sarkar, Editorial Assistant has put this story together