Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
The High Court strictly noted that such a conduct is unbecoming for a person belonging to legal profession and also reprimanded the Tribunal for withholding the compensation from the petitioner due to a fee dispute between a layer and their client.
“The absence of guidelines cannot ipso facto result in invalidation of Bihar Private Schools (Fee Regulation) Act, 2019, especially one in the nature of regulation aimed at ensuring that education is not commercialized and reduced to mere means of profiteering.”
VLCC failed to deliver on their promise by not conducting the courses as per the agreed terms. Furthermore, their suggestion to adjust the course fees against the enrolment of a relative was found to be unfair and contrary to consumer protection principles by DCDRC.
Madras High Court said that if the Arbitrators are not paid their fees / costs on account of the moratorium order, the object of arbitration will get defeated, as competent Arbitrators will hesitate to become Arbitrators in a dispute involving Companies facing financial crisis.
Delhi High Court: In a petition filed challenging the vires of Rule 14 of Building & Other Construction Workers Welfare
Supreme Court: Interpreting the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) introduced by amendment w.e.f. 01.04.2009, the
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India has notified Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals) (Second Amendment) Regulations,
On 18-07-2022, SEBI has issued a circular for all the Market Infrastructure Institutions, Companies who have listed / are intending list their
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi: In a matter with regard to fees of resolution professional, the Coram of Justice
Supreme Court: In the instant appeals, the Market Committees located in Rajasthan raised their grievance over the decision of CESTAT that respective
Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of L. Nageswara Rao* and Krishna Murari, JJ., addressed the plight of NEET students. The Bench
Supreme Court: In a major win for Private Schools in the State of Rajasthan, the bench of AM Khanwilkar and Dinesh Maheshwari,
Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench of Sanjib Banerjee and Moushumi Bhattacharya, JJ., while addressing the issues raised in the present petition observed
Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., partly allowed a writ petition filed by the Society of Catholic Education Institutions in Rajasthan
Madras High Court: N. Anand Venkatesh, J., stated that in case the Schools are violating the High Court’s earlier Order with regard to
Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench of Sanjib Banerjee and Moushumi Bhattacharya, JJ., while addressing the matter wherein private unaided schools have debarred
Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of S.C. Sharma and Virender Singh, JJ., stating that the Society
Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), Mumbai: The Coram of Tarun Agarwala, J., (Presiding Officer), Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member) and M.T. Joshi, J., (Member)
As reported by The Indian Express in its news report dated 28.12.2017, a Division Bench comprising of Chief Justice R. Subhash Reddy