IBC
Supreme Court year-end roundup| From important judgments to unmissable facts and stories, here’s a comprehensive roundup of all that happened in 2020
2020 has been a year of COVID-19, challenges, and changes. Of many things that this year has taught us, one of the
Justification of Means to End: Nature of Notification under Section 4 of IBC
by Anurag Tripathi* & Naman Singh Bagga**
Central Govt. extends the period for suspension of initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process by 3 months
S.O. 4638(E)— In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016), the
An Overview of the Panel Discussion on”4 Years of IBC – The Revolution Witnessed and the Promise for Future” [Watch the Panel Discussion]
A panel discussion on “4 Years of IBC – The Revolution Witnessed and the Promise for Future” was held on 12th December,
E-launch of Akaant Mittal’s Book on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
On 12th December, 2020 Eastern Book Company held its first virtual book launch and panel discussion on the occasion of the release
NCLAT | Whether Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process can be initiated against Principal Borrower and Corporate Guarantor simultaneously for same set of debt and default? Tribunal decides
National Company Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Division Bench of Justice A.I.S Cheena (Judicial Member) and V.P. Singh (Technical Member) reinforced that in the
NCLT | Whether Resolution Professional is under obligation to make over payment of shortfall in gratuity payable to employees? NCLT examines
National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT): The Coram of Dr Deepti Mukesh (Judicial Member) and Sumita Purkayastha (Technical Member), reiterated that any shortfall in
Winding Up v. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
by Amir Arsiwala* & Ishan J Ravindranath**
Whether an ‘Unsuccessful Resolution Applicant’ whose Resolution Plan gets rejected by CoC has locus to question implementation of approved Resolution Plan? NCLAT thoroughly determines
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Bench of Justice Bansi Lal Bhat (Acting Chairperson) and Justice Anant Bijay Singh (Judicial Member), Dr
Weighing the effect and need of the ‘minimum threshold’ on the home-buyers
by Pareekshit Bishnoi & Parveen Kumar Aggarwal*
SEBI | Fraudulent misstatements in financial statements will amount to misrepresentation /unfair trade practice under Regulation 4(2) of SEBI PFUTP Regulations, 2003
Securities Exchange Board of India: G. Mahalingam, Whole-time member retrained the promoters of the Dewan Housing Finance Limited i.e. DHFL from accessing
Del HC | Is the liability of Principal Borrower and Guarantor co-extensive? Court reiterates SC’s position on continuation of SARFAESI proceedings against Guarantor by banks
Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of Hima Kohli and Subramonium Prasad, JJ., considered the following question: Whether a bank/financial institution can institute
All petitions challenging the IBC provisions relating to personal guarantors transferred to Supreme Court
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is at a nascent stage and it is better that the interpretation of the provisions of the Code is taken up by the Supreme Court to avoid any confusion.
NCLAT reiterates IBC is beneficial legislation intended to put Corporate Debtor on its feet, not a mere money recovery legislation
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Bench of Justice Bansi Lal Bhat (Acting Chairperson) and Justice Anant Bijay Sing (Judicial Member) and
[SC ALERT] NCLAT’s decoder on appointment of a person as Resolution Professional: Will an ex-employee of Financial Creditor be eligible for appointment? Read on
SUPREME COURT ALERT This NCLAT Order has been set aside by the Supreme Court, the detailed report of which can be found
Perjury in the National Company Law Tribunal and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal: An Opinion
by Amir Arsiwala* & Ishan J Ravindranath**
Remedy against Guarantor – IBC – A better choice
by Umesh Shetty*