Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
“It will be essential for the Court to carefully assess the evidence presented, in order to determine whether there is sufficient material to establish the intention and knowledge to insult the modesty of the complainant or, whether any act was intended to shock the sense of decency of the complainant being a woman”.
The Court reiterated that before passing any stigmatic order for removal of any employee from service, a departmental enquiry was required to be conducted.
“The act of terminating services of the petitioners, so as to deprive them of the benefits of Government Resolution was illegal and contrary to the principles of natural justice.”
The Court observed that the Labour Court’s Award is not happily worded, especially where it holds that in absence of a police complaint, employee’s act of overwriting on gate pass cannot be considered forgery.
Justice Chandra Dhari Singh observed that the entire saga of the series of appointments, absorption and promotion of Siddharth Rao, Secretary of Delhi Legislative Assembly, is tainted with irregularities and illegalities, de-hors the rules or due process of law, without approval by the competent authority and hence vitiated.
Rajasthan High Court: In a case of an illegal termination of a Manager of Kotak Mahindra Bank being pending for
Bombay High Court: Milind N. Jadhav, J. remanded back a matter of “Rashtriya Mul Niwasi Bahujan Karamchari Sangh” to the Industrial Court