Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
“Once it is concluded that a live telecast will not fall within the ambit of the expression “work”, it will be wholly erroneous to hold that the income derived by the assessee in respect of “live feed” will fall within clause (v) of Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.”
Calcutta High Court observed that the assessing officer issued the impugned notice based on the high-value cash deposits during the demonetization period.
“Passing orders of issuance of a process without appreciating the statutory provisions and cautiously examining the material on record may put the wheels of criminal law in motion and summon an innocent individual to stand trial.”
“It is settled law that the Act provides a complete machinery for assessment or re-assessment of tax and the assessee is not permitted to abandon that machinery to invoke jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.”
Justice B. V Nagarathna is currently serving as a Judge of Supreme Court of India. She formerly served as a Judge of Karnataka High Court until her elevation to the Supreme Court. Justice Nagarathna is also the potential contender for the first ever woman Chief Justice of India.
The Finance Act, 2017 introduced a system by which electoral bonds could be issued by any scheduled bank for the purpose of electoral funding.
The instant appeals had challenged the orders passed by Kerala High Court, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (‘CIT(A)’) and Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’).
Calcutta High Court held that the order passed by the assessing officer under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act was not a non-speaking order and did not suffer from a lack of application of mind.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 8 and 11: Application seeking reference to arbitration in pending civil suit is not acceptable
by Dr Shashwat Bajpai†
Criminal Law — Criminal Trial — Circumstantial Evidence — Generally: Principles reiterated relating to essential conditions that must be fulfilled before conviction
By Tarun Jain†
Cite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 66
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 21 Rr. 84, 85 and 90 — Auction-sale whether vitiated — Non-compliance with mandatory provisions of
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — S. 24(2) — Lapse whether occasioned: There
Constitution of India — Art. 226 — Maintainability of writ petition: A writ under Art. 226 against a private educational institute would
by Suvendu Kumar Pati†
The Supreme Court observed that the consequences on nonpayment or belated remittance of the TDS would be under Section 201(1A) and Section 276-B of Income Tax Act, 1961.
The Supreme Court stated that the erroneous assessment order had resulted in loss of the Revenue in the form of tax. Thus, the High Court had committed a very serious error in setting aside the order passed by the Commissioner passed in exercise of powers under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
The Delhi High Court observed that there was an unexplained substantial delay in issuing the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 09-11-2017 and thus, is inexcusable in the eyes of law
ITAT noted that an identical issue was subject matter of consideration of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case, hence following the precedent, the Tribunal directed that the payment received in this case cannot be treated as FTS under Article 12 (5) of India Netherlands DTAA.