Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator — Whether Absolute Prohibition Contrary to the Scheme of the Act?
by Prashant Tripathi† and Sanjeev Singh††
by Prashant Tripathi† and Sanjeev Singh††
Madras High Court held that the petitioners are not entitled to join respondents 3 to 5 as parties to arbitral proceedings, as they do not qualify as “alter egos” of the first respondent or as successors-in-interest.
by Shivaprakash M. Nagarale†
by Simran Pahwa† and Yasha Goyal††
Karnataka High Court: A Division bench of Ritu Raj Awasthi, CJ., and Suraj Govindaraj, J. issued notice to the respondent and listed
Supreme Court: While addressing the issue related to jurisdiction of Court under Section 11(6) of the A&C Act, the 3-judge Bench comprising
by Hiroo Advani† and Manav Nagpal††
Delhi High Court: Vibhu Bakhru, J., held that the scope of interference with an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration