Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
The Court urged the Resident Doctors to call-off their strike and request their fellow doctors to rejoin their duties and the same is accepted by the doctors representing JARD.
The Court held that the petition was effectively a review in disguise, which is barred under Section 362 CrPC and cannot be entertained.
“OMR answer sheets are electronically evaluated for the purpose of ensuring minimum human intervention, so as to ensure secrecy and credibility of the entire examination process.”
Rajasthan High Court held that contractual engagement does not confer a vested right of employment to workers engaged through placement agencies.
Rajasthan High Court reiterated that the burden of proof lies with the petitioners to demonstrate the incorrectness of the disputed answers.
Justice Sameer Jain of the Rajasthan High Court, Chairman of the SAFEMA and PMLA Appellate Tribunal Justice M.N. Bhandari, Rajasthan’s Additional Solicitor General Mr. RD Rastogi, Chief Editor of SCC Mr. Surendra Malik, joined Justice Rastogi in releasing EBC’s ‘Money Laundering: Prevention, Law & Practice’ by Abhijeet Sharma.