Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
The Court further noted that the new statutory framework under Telecommunications Act, 2023 and Telecommunications (Right of Way) Rules, 2024, now governs the installation, operation and maintenance of telecommunication towers.
“In the present case, there is no challenge to Land Disposal Regulations, which empower Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) to make allotments by entertaining private applications.”
Maharashtra Airport Development Company Limited (‘MADC’) is an instrumentality of State and is expected to act fairly. If MADC is permitted to retain the advance amount, the same would amount to unjust enrichment, as it has already allotted 33 acres of land to other entities at much higher rate.
Mere registration of title with the film producers’ association does not create any statutory right in favour of the plaintiff to restrain defendants from using the title ‘LOOTERE’ for making of their web series.
“Capability of a car for personal use would not ipso facto lead to automatic presumption that every car would be personal effects for being excluded from capital assets of the Assessee.”
Mere maintenance of running account by the appellant with GPIL, having continuous business transactions with them or mere repayment of advance within same financial year cannot be the reasons to admit that the amount of advance is actually utilized for execution of business transaction.
“Both the registered proprietors are well equipped to protect their rights flowing from registered GI in Kolhapuri Chappals by bringing action against PRADA, if they believe that PRADA is unauthorisedly using the registered GI.”
“It is evident that the provisions of the POSH Act apply where the relationship of employer and employee exists, thus, neither Bar Council of India nor Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa can be said to be employer of advocates.”
“The impugned road line had affected petitioner’s civil rights and therefore opportunity of hearing was necessary, though not specifically provided in Section 291 of the MMC Act and subsequently the Slum Rehabilitation Authority needs to properly apply its mind to all the relevant factors after granting opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned.”
“There might be cases where a candidate belonging to a particular religion, in which polygamy is not prohibited, has contracted multiple marriages. If contention about impermissibility to add column in Form 26 Affidavit is accepted, such candidate would never be able to contest any election as disclosure of information about additional wife would attract ground for declaring the election void.”
A PIL was filed by a social worker-petitioner in 2014 in relation to New Year eve liquor party, but no action was taken, hence, petitioner sought re-enquiry.
The State Government is presently considering the financial impact and will take an appropriate decision regarding the creation of additional posts for the State Information Commissioners if the occasion arises.
The State Government is directed to take a policy decision regarding immersion of idols made of PoP in the light of the recommendations dated 21-5-2025 issued by the Expert Committee of Central Pollution Control Board.
The Internal Complaints Committee of HDFC Sales (P) Ltd. did not consider the important issue that whether the allegations levelled against the petitioner in really constituted sexual harassment to the complainant.
Automotive Research Association of India performed various functions other than certification of vehicles and all its functions are not carried out under the authority of the Central Government.
Once the resignation is withdrawn, there is nothing to be discussed in the Gram Panchayat meeting and the meeting qua the subject of resignation must be terminated immediately after desire for withdrawal for resignation is expressed.
The action for suspension, removal, or dismissal of the trustee under Section 41-D of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 (‘the MPT Act’) is an independent action having no connection with the enquiry to be conducted under Section 22 of the MPT Act.
The exact gestures made by appellant are not reflected in the FIR statement, which merely alleges making of bizarre gestures and whether the gestures allegedly made by appellant fit into the expression “gestures of a sexual nature” is questionable at this stage.
Both Labour as well as Industrial Court have concurrently held that apart from performing supervisory nature of duties, the petitioner did not himself perform any manual, skilled, unskilled or clerical work.
The Court found it shocking that the CGIT did not find the act of an employee slapping his supervisor without provocation to be serious, and such misconduct ought to be visited with penalty of termination.