Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
Applying Section 3 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, the Calcutta High Court determined that the dispute is governed by the tenancy act.
With regards to custody of the child, the Calcutta High Court after considering the paramount welfare of the child, held the husband is not fit person for custody.
Calcutta High Court determined that the compromise decree indicated that the vendors-defendants (respondent 2 and 3) do not have title to the property.
Calcutta High Court opined that there was no contract between the parties due to the lack of a meeting of minds, therefore, the Specific Relief Act, 1963 cannot be invoked.
Calcutta High Court set aside impugned order due to the lack of evidence for subletting and the non-maintainability of the suit.