
S. 30 of Advocates Act | Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings but have no right to cross-examine: MP High Court
“There is no bar under Section 52 of Forest Act, 1927 from appearance of Advocates in said proceedings.”
“There is no bar under Section 52 of Forest Act, 1927 from appearance of Advocates in said proceedings.”
The petitioner’s wife informed the Court that she had left the petitioner’s house in 2006 due to his merciless beatings of her and their sons and the petitioner is fully aware of the reasons for her departure.
MP High Court affirmed the candidates’ right to access information about the performance of other candidates as part of a public activity.
“No reasonable person would believe the prosecutrix’s allegations given the circumstances and inconsistencies in her statements.”
The petitioner, Congress candidate PC Sharma, has alleged irregularities in the election process, specifically regarding the functioning of EVMs.
Madhya Pradesh High Court granted bail to the accused based on the examination of key witnesses and his extended period of incarceration.
Madhya Pradesh High Court warned the appellants of consequences, including contempt of court, for non-compliance with the directions.