‘Polo/Ralph Lauren Co. failed to establish prima facie infringement’; Tis Hazari Court vacates interim injunction against Home Needs for use of mark ‘POLO Lifetime’
“Marks of plaintiff and defendant appear quite distinctive as except the word mark POLO there is no similarity. The defendant’s mark uses suffix ‘LIFETIME’ which is predominant whereas plaintiff’s mark uses suffix ‘Ralph Lauren’ and ‘picture of polo player’.”