2025 SCC Vol. 1 Part 4
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 11(6) — Substantive claims of petitioner whether time-barred i.e. issue of limitation requiring intricate evidentiary
Limitation Act 1963
SC discusses limitation on subsequent suit for same cause of action if filed after 3 years of rejection of earlier plaint & when right to sue accrues
“The right to sue under Article 113 of the Limitation Act accrues when there is an accrual of rights asserted in the suit and an unequivocal threat by the defendant to infringe the right asserted by the plaintiff in the suit.”
3 years or 12 years? Supreme Court clarifies the period of limitation to regain title and recover possession of suit property by setting aside the sale deed
“When the suit is based on the title for possession, once the title is established on the basis of relevant documents and other evidence unless the defendant proves adverse possession for the prescriptive period, the plaintiff cannot be non-suited.”
SC directs all States to penalise officers responsible for delay in filling of appeals causing huge loss to Government exchequer
“Though the Government adopts systematic approach in handling the legal issues and preferring the petitions/applications/appeals well within the time, due to the fault on the part of the officials in merely communicating the information on time, huge revenue loss will be caused to the Government exchequer.”
Challenging Varindera: Time to Reform Condonation?
by Akash Hogade†
Calcutta High Court allows 6 months extension of Arbitral Mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Calcutta High Court emphasized the distinction between vigilant litigants and those contributing to unnecessary delays in the arbitration process, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioner.
NCLAT | Can the OTS proposal be an ‘acknowledgment of debt’ under S. 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963?
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Delhi: The Bench of Anant Bijay Singh, J., Judicial Member, and Shreesha Merla, Technical Member,
Signature obtained by fraud? Burden of proof is on the party alleging such forgery; says SC
Supreme Court: The bench of AM Khanwilkar* and Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ has held that for invoking Section 17 of the Limitation Act,
EBC’s Coat Pocket Edition of — Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Limitation Act, 1963 [Edn. 8, 2019]
Overview Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Limitation Act, 1963 alongwith Special Amendments by Act 4 of 2016 and Commercial Courts Act, 2015 The