Litigation, Integrity, and the Future of Law: In conversation with Senior Advocate Malvika Trivedi
Interviewed by Shaleen Bareja
litigation
‘Delays in system cannot be solely attributed to one particular organ of State’: Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal at Third IBA India Litigation and ADR Symposium
Third IBA India Litigation and ADR Symposium 2024: From fringe to focal: India at the centre of international dispute resolution- a symposium presented by the IBA India Working Group of the IBA Asia Pacific Regional Forum and supported by the IBA Arbitration Committee
1st IDIA Legal Skillathon
The Increasing Diversity by Increasing Access to Legal Education (IDIA) Madhya Pradesh Chapter
Confidentiality in Arbitration: Legal and Practical Challenges in India
by Vasanth Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada**
Counsel cannot claim any share out of the fruits of litigation from their client as fee; Such an action amounts to professional misconduct: J&K and Ladakh HC
The High Court strictly noted that such a conduct is unbecoming for a person belonging to legal profession and also reprimanded the Tribunal for withholding the compensation from the petitioner due to a fee dispute between a layer and their client.
Delhi High Court dismisses PIL challenging method of empanelment of Government Advocates by calling it a ‘Publicity Interest Litigation’
Delhi High Court observed that it seems that the petitioner, who is an Advocate, filed the present petition after being a beneficiary of the very same process only because he has been denied extension or reappointment.
Karnataka HC | Simply in order to dispose of cases, Courts should not dismiss complaints where the presence/attendance of the complainant is not an essential requirement
Karnataka High Court: While deciding the instant appeal for restoration assailing the order passed by the Trial Court wherein the
Karnataka HC | Clients cannot make out a case of fraud against their advocate just because advocate was unable secure them a favourable order
Karnataka High Court: While deciding the instant petition seeking quashment of complaint against a Senior Advocate, wherein it was alleged that he
In conversation with Sanchit Garga, Advocate On Record, Supreme Court of India on life as an Independent Counsel
Interviewed by Vranda Agarwal
USLLS’ Lecture Series | Lecture III: Nuances of Supreme Court Litigation: From Procedure to Court Craft by Mr. Raghenth Basant (Advocate, Supreme Court) (June 28, 2022)
The Internship & Placement Cell of the University School of Law and Legal Studies, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi is organizing
Law of Limitation| Exercise of power of discretion if made excessively, it would defeat the purpose and object of law of limitation; Courts not to travel beyond permissible extent
Madras High Court: Expressing that, Power of discretion is to be exercised to mitigate the injustice if any occurred to the litigants,
Thoughts of a Wandering Mind during Lockdown
by Radhika Bishwajeet Dubey†
Raj HC | “Citizen approaching Court in a public interest jurisdiction holds greater duty to make full research” PIL dismissed due to lack of necessary evidence presented
Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ and Rekha Borana, J. dismissed the petition and kept it open for
Examining the Validity of Asymmetrical and Optional Arbitration Clauses
by Hiroo Advani†, Asif Lampwala††, Kenneth Martin††† and Srishti Ramchandani*
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 13
Traffic blockage due to agitation, failure to deliver consignment within validity period of e-way bill; SC imposes cost of Rs. 59000 on Sales Tax Officer for illegally imposing penalty
“When the undeniable facts, including the traffic blockage due to agitation, are taken into consideration, the State alone remains responsible for not providing smooth passage of traffic.”
If an advocate has appeared for a party in judicial or quasi-judicial capacity or even as a mediator, Can Court injunct him from appearing to maintain stream of justice? Del HC expounds in clear worded decision
Delhi High Court: While expressing its opinion on the position of an advocate in law, C. Hari Shankar, J., expressed that, There
Parties can’t play fraud with the Court by suppressing details of related previous or ongoing legal proceedings: SC
Supreme Court: In a case where the party, in a subsequent petition seeking same relief, had not disclosed the filing of the