Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“As per Article 348(1)(b)(iii) of the Constitution of India, the authoritative texts of all orders, rules, Regulations and bye-laws issued under the Constitution or under any law made by Parliament or the Legislature of a State, shall be in the English language.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court asked, “Why are at least two members from NCLT Delhi or NCLT Mumbai not being permanently posted at the NCLT Bench in Indore?”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The definition of ‘rape’ excludes acts between a man and his wife, not below the age of fifteen years, performed during the subsistence of a valid marriage.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Amounts of retiral dues, including gratuity, are not bounties. It is deferred payment to the employee for the long services rendered by him to the Department… The retiral dues are also recognized as property under the Article 300-A of the Constitution.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The then SP Datia has no regards for the law of land, and he is in habit of functioning as a Police Officer according to his own whims and wishes, thereby giving a complete go-by to the law of the land.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The nominee is nothing but a trustee who holds money on behalf of all the legal representatives.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court reiterated that heinous offences and crimes against society cannot be quashed merely on the basis of compromise.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court directed the State to requisition and submit the case diary and relevant documents before the next date of hearing.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

When the Court asked the Senior Advocate about the presence of respondent 5 in Court, instead of responding to the query, he created a ruckus in the Court by shouting at top of his voice, which is recorded in the live-streamed recording of the Court.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

When the Court asked the Senior Advocate about the presence of respondent 5 in Court, instead of responding to the query, he created a ruckus in the Court by shouting at top of his voice, which is recorded in the live-streamed recording of the Court.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“In a democratic country, protestors can protest but they cannot disturb the protocol of Prime Minister and Vice President;” State argued.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The question regarding State’s accountability for missing liquor stock is not a mere contractual dispute

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court did not find “any illegality prima facie in the case of engaging lawyers by the autonomous body i.e. MPNRC and paying the professional fees as per their norms.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court took a prima facie view of the matter and issued notice to all respondents.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Traffic jams are not new to the world and are known to be highly contagious … if the vehicles are allowed to enter in the 56 Dukan area from MG road, it would lead to a total chaos.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“A person’s identity is not lost when he is not recognized by a machine, and in such circumstances, his claim has to be verified on the basis of the documents which he possesses regarding his identification.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Without demanding permanent alimony in the written statement or by a separate application, Trial Court would not have granted permanent alimony to the respondent/wife.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Section 94 of IBC gives remedy to “debtor’ only to either apply personally or through a Resolution Professional to the Adjudicating Authority for initiating the insolvency resolution process.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court rejected the intervener’s application with costs of Rs. 10,000/- to be deposited in the account of the High Court Employees Union within 15 days.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is unfortunate that even the Divisional Commissioner, Shahdol has chosen to merely countersign an order of rejection of appeal, without application of mind.”