Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“In most of the cases, we found that the age of the victim/child/girl is between 16 to 18 years and the age of the offender is 19 to 22 years. In our opinion, this is a serious issue and threat to the future of the youth of the country.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The controversy stems from the government’s declaration of the Nawab of Bhopal’s properties as enemy property as the Nawab’s elder daughter, Princess Abida Sultan, moved to Pakistan in 1950.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The respondent expressed remorse and tenders an apology, undertakes that in future he will ensure maintenance of proper decorum of the Court and volunteered to undertake social service.

MP High Court Senior Advocates
Hot Off The PressNews

The Advocates who secured above 50 points were recommended for designation as Senior Advocates by the Permanent Committee.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

These guidelines will remain in force until the Government of Madhya Pradesh examines the situation and incorporates appropriate provisions into the Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1994.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court criticized the authorities for their prolonged inertia despite prior orders and sanctioned plans.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“When an accused is in custody under PMLA irrespective of the case for which he is under custody, any statement under section 50 of PMLA to the same investigating agency is inadmissible against the maker.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that the provisions regarding social audit under the Municipal Corporation Act, 1956, should be invoked cautiously to customize schemes effectively.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is expected from a litigant to approach the court with all bonafides and without any ill-motive.”

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait
Know thy Judge

From his leadership roles during his student days to his significant contributions as an advocate and judge, Justice Suresh Kumar Kait’s journey serves as an inspiration for aspiring legal professionals, especially those from humble beginnings.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the instant matter, the State Bar Council of MP issued a communication calling on lawyers in the State to abstain from judicial work in order to protest against the High Court’s scheme mandating the disposal of 25 oldest cases every quarter.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The arrest should be rational, fair and as per law and shall not be merely based upon guilt of accused established from inadmissible evidence.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court added that this directive does not affect ongoing recruitment where examinations have already been conducted.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The wife was appointed as Assistant Manager in LIC Housing Finance Ltd., and at time the respondent was doing nothing, this was the reason why husband compelled the appellant to leave the job and stay with him.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The enquiry is nothing but an eye wash because the same was conducted without following any procedure which had to be mandatorily followed.”

High Court Weekly Roundup
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The applicant bore sole responsibility for any adverse effects arising from the inability to cross-examine the prosecutrix due to repeated delay tactics.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court deemed the Coordinate Bench decision in Narmadi Prasad v. State of M.P., as per incuriam, as it did not consider the Aadhaar Card’s intended use solely as identity-only proof.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

As per the provisions of Muslim law and the DV Act, the Court opined that the present petitioner being father-in-law of respondent, cannot be compelled to give maintenance to the respondent.