Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Key issues under scrutiny include whether the properties attributed to this formulation of specific strain of Bifidobacterium longum are sufficiently distinct from prior art to merit patent protection and whether the claimed synergistic effects of the formulation demonstrate a significant technical advancement.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Based on the detailed comparison and the combined teachings along with examples of common general knowledge, it is established that the claimed invention lacks an inventive step. The features of portability, comprehensive monitoring, and anomaly detection are either disclosed in or can be inferred from the prior arts.

Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court said that the Controller is correct in stating that both the cited prior art and the claimed invention provide for the transmission of sensor data to a subscribing application, but the difference lies in how such data is transmitted.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is not in doubt that the composition is at best a derivative and would be the same substance as the ‘known substance’, therefore, unless and until significant enhancement of therapeutic efficacy is shown, such a composition would not be liable to be granted patent protection.”