Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
“The Arbitrator has clearly misconducted by citing the pretext of non-existent Covid-19 restrictions for his own inefficiency, but hurriedly making the award when lockdown restrictions actually existed.”
BPL Ltd., having knowingly entered into the bill discounting agreement, was bound by its terms. Since it defaulted on repayment for years, the stipulated 36% compound interest could not be considered burdensome or oppressive.
SCC Online has officially signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with The Dialogue, to foster a robust ecosystem for legal and policy research.
The Arbitrator was, therefore, not justified in undertaking interpretation of the contractual terms contrary to language used therein, which merely mirrored the policy decisions of the Railway Board which were binding in nature”.
Delhi Govt approves the increase in numbers of Law Researchers for Delhi High Court and remuneration hike at ₹80,000, enhancing legal research support.
UIDAI’s 2025 amendment marks a strategic evolution in Aadhaar governance, balancing cost recovery with public interest and operational efficiency
The Court relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in a case where a similar amendment of by State of Rajasthan was held ultra vires Article 14 and Article 246 of the Constitution due to the doctrine of public policy being vague and uncertain.
Vijaya Bank while issuing the appointment letter to the respondent, included a restrictive covenant carrying an indemnity clause, wherein the respondent had to pay the Bank if he leaves the service before completion of 3 years.
by Prerana Priyanshu* and Asad Hussain**
Interviewed by K V Vinaya
by Vasanth Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada**
“Applying the ‘eye of the needle’ test, the Court has no hesitation in observing that the prima facie scrutiny of the facts of the present case, leads to a clear conclusion that there is not even a vestige of doubt that the claim is non-arbitrable.”
The GNLU International Conference on Business, Law & Public Policy (GICBLP), in collaboration with Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas
[Submissions for papers are invited for NLIU-CPS Journal for Legislative Drafting and Parliamentary Research (JLDPR) (Volume III). The last date of submission is December 10, 2024]
School of Law, CHRIST (Deemed to be University) Bangalore is hosting the first edition of the National Blog Writing Competition on ADR
The Court stated that recovery of excess amount from the employee was not permissible, if there was no misrepresentation or suppression by the petitioner.
by Karan Ajitsaria† and Nitesh Sharma††
Arbitral proceedings are not cricket matches, where hitting beyond the boundary is usually rewarded
“When no opportunity is given to deal with an argument which goes to the root of the case based on evidence which go behind the back of the party and results in a denial of justice to the prejudice of the party, the same would amount to violation of principle of natural justice.”
The 1st edition of the National Policy Drafting Competition named Shastrarth is being organized by Public Policy and Governance Committee and Law