Delhi High Court grants ₹10 Lakh damages in Ramada Trademark infringement case; ClubRamada restrained from using ‘Ramada’ Mark”
It is manifest that defendant 1 had direct knowledge of the plaintiffs’ RAMADA brand at the time of adoption of the impugned mark. The defendant’s justification for adopting the mark ‘RAMADA’ is an afterthought, and lacks bona fide intent, as it fails to provide any tenable rationale for its selection.