data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e406/8e406a47ce718cfa3448573678e3983fff03b32c" alt="Sikkim High Court"
[Comprehensive Policy or Act Policy] | “No premium was paid to cover a gratuitous passenger”; Sikkim HC upholds compensation granted by MACT as per an Act Policy
The Court referred to National Insurance Co. Ltd v. Balakrishnan, wherein the Supreme Court had distinguished between a Comprehensive/Package Policy and Act Policy by stating that an Act Policy cannot cover a third-party risk of an occupant in a car, but a Comprehensive/Package Policy would cover such risk.