Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
The informant’s statement does not identify individual/s as victims whose deaths/injuries can be relatable to specific acts of commission/omission on the part of applicants before this Court.
The Court held that the benefit of reasonable doubt shall be given to the appellants and therefore partly allowed both the appeals, by acquitting them under Section 302 of IPC, and releasing the incarcerated appellants sentenced under Section 307 of IPC, for having served the ordered sentence period.
“The sword of justice given to a Judge has to be exercise with utmost responsibility and judiciously considering the reforms.”
Meghalaya High Court said as the son-in-law did not have the intention to cause death.