In light of non-compliance of Order VI Rule 17 CPC, application for amendment of written statement rightly rejected: Bom HC
Bombay High Court: A Bench of M.S. Sonak, J. dismissed a petition and stated that there is no jurisdictional error in the
written statement
Delay in ‘filing’ and ‘re-filing’ written statement to be considered on different footing
Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Jayant Nath, J. allowed an appeal filed against the previous order whereby the right
Order passed by the State Commission on the basis of an alleged settlement between the parties cannot be held valid in the absence of a written settlement
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Division Bench comprising of R.K. Agarwal, J., M. Shreesha, Member, allowed an appeal filed against
Court free to invoke provisions of Order 8 Rule 10 CPC if defendant fails to file WS; permanent injunction granted against use of trademark CBN NEWS
Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Jayant Nath, J. decreed a suit for permanent injunction by invoking the provisions
Time period under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC for filing written statement is directory and not mandatory in nature
Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., allowed a writ petition filed by the petitioner against the order
Defendant allowed to file written statement despite the defence being struck off
Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Arun Palli, J. allowed the defendant to file the written statement