Lawyers at the Police Station
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Gautam Khazanchi* and Vinayak Chawla**

Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

On 06-03-2025, the Kerala High Court denied anticipatory bail to Shuhaib.

Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court underscored the necessity of concrete evidence in criminal prosecutions, particularly in cases involving digital content. The ruling reinforces those mere allegations, unsupported by forensic proof or substantial material, cannot justify the continuation of criminal proceedings.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The video recorded by Defendant 1 is extremely offensive, sexually explicit, foul and filthy utterances were made in the said video by Defendant 1 against the plaintiffs, which per se shocks the conscience of the court.”

Saket Court
Case BriefsDistrict Court

BJP’s Mumbai spokesperson Suresh Karamshi Nakhua filed a defamation suit against YouTuber Dhruv Rathee for his video titled ‘My Reply to Godi Youtubers’.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Several defamatory statements were made against Malabar Gold Ltd. by Respondent 1 on his YouTube channel titled “Marunadan Malayali”.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It was said that the allegations asserted did not seem to be premised on a public record document such as a criminal case that was registered or pending against Dhanya Rajendran.

Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Calcutta High Court, in a previous order, requested the parties to consider resolving the dispute by blurring out or removing fruit juice packets deceptively similar to Dabur’s ‘Real’ fruit juice from the impugned video.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“A thin line of distinction exists between defamation and public criticism and an onerous task lies with the Courts to maintain this delicate balance between the competing claims and rights.”

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Several members of Aam Aadmi Party including members of various other opposition parties made an audio and video recording of Court proceedings which had been circulated on various social media platforms.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The press and the Media had a duty to report the incident for the benefit of the public, but there is also a corresponding duty to remain truthful to the incident. The deepfake videos showing plaintiff being beaten up are nothing but an over-sensationalisation and depiction of facts which are patently false.

Sattai Duraimurugan
Hot Off The PressNews

In 2021 Madras High Court granted bail to Sattai. Later, a Division Bench of High Court cancelled the bail. However, in 2022, the Supreme Court granted interim bail to him, and he has been out on bail since then.

Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Dhruv Rathee uploaded a video on his YouTube channel claiming that the consumption of packaged fruit juices leads to type II diabetes and that drinking packaged fruit juices leads to hair loss and is harmful if consumed.

madras high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

This is another case which serves as a reminder to those in positions of power and influence whose words and deeds have a wider reach and impact on the citizenry of this country.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

As per a status report dated 20-11-2023, the use of the mark ‘AAJ TAK’ has been disabled on all channels, and the domain names have been either suspended, locked or blocked.

High Court weekly Roundup2
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“There can be no doubt that the right to freedom of speech deserves to be protected in order to communicate facts which are verifiable. Such facts ought to be based on credible test reports.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The portal, People of India is approaching the very same subjects who are shown on the website, Humans of Bombay, in order to create an imitative platform.”

madras high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madras High Court directed Savukku to file an affidavit of undertaking, that in future he shall guard himself against violating any orders passed by any Court, or even make any comments which may impinge the majesty of the Courts.

madras high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Considering the fact that Senthil Balaji is a public person, the YouTube videos and tweets only make various allegations against him in performance of his official duties. Further, most of the statements are already available in public domain.