
Supreme Court Monthly Roundup – June 2020
TOP STORIES COVID-19 Procedural Relaxations| SC’s March 23 order on extension of limitation not applicable to the period of filing charge sheet
Continue readingTOP STORIES COVID-19 Procedural Relaxations| SC’s March 23 order on extension of limitation not applicable to the period of filing charge sheet
Continue readingby Dhruv Gupta*
Continue readingFor effective control and containment over Spread of corona Virus, in supersession of all previous directions, following directions are issued for Subordinate
Continue readingIn continuation of Notifications No.49,50,51 and 53 of the High Court of Manipur issued to combat the pandemic spread of Corona Virus
Continue readingTelangana High Court declares suspension of regular Judicial and Administrative work till 14-04-2020. However, High Court will take up extreme urgent matters
Continue readingArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 34 — Extension of limitation period/Condonation of delay beyond the period prescribed: S. 5 of
Continue readingCIRCULAR Subject:- Framing RTI Rules, 2017 in supersession of RTI Rules, 2012 — comments regarding. A proposal for making Rules under RTI i.e.
Continue readingMadras High Court: This division bench of S. Manikumar and D. Krishnakumar, JJ held that there can be no order for condonation
Continue readingStay informed with the latest Supreme Court judgments from June 2025, covering critical topics such as Investigating Agencies’ authority to summon Lawyers; Rs. 21 Crore MSP fraud case; Andhra Pradesh liquor scam case; Howrah Court assault case. Explore the key rulings shaping the legal landscape.
Continue readingA quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
Continue readingExplore the latest cases reported in HCC’s Goods & Service Tax Reports (GSTR) Volume on Confiscation, CENVAT Credit, Merchandise Exports from India Scheme, Export Oriented Unit (EoU), Refund, Valuation, Export-Import Policies and much more.
Continue readingThe Court noted that the registry did not follow the procedure prescribed in the GHC Rules for movement of the papers from the registry to the competent Court, thus there was no occasion for consideration by the Court concerned as to whether the respondents were entitled to condonation of delay in removal of office objections.
Continue reading“The present issue is a classic example of the lethargic attitude of several bureaucrats. It appears that they have no concern towards the common man and poor litigants, who are approaching the Court for justice.”
Continue readingJustice R. Mahadevan’s journey from a law graduate in Chennai to a Supreme Court Judge is a story of commitment, expertise, and unwavering dedication to the field of law.
Continue readingby Siddharth R. Gupta* and Mahak Jain**
Continue readingWelcome to the Land of Cholas, Tiruchirappalli! The Tamil Nadu National Law University (TNNLU), through its Moot Court Committee in collaboration with
Continue readingby Aseem Chaturvedi*, Arpit Kumar Singh**, Siddhant Kumar*** and Amaan Khan****
Continue reading